Comment on some proposed mechanisms for attenuation of third sound

M. W. Cole; D. L. Goodstein

doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.9.2806

Comment on some proposed mechanisms for attenuation of third sound

M. W. Cole
, D. L. Goodstein

Physics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Two explanations have been proposed for an apparent discrepancy between theoretical prediction and experimental measurement of third-sound attenuation. One of these proposes a new "macroscopic quantum uncertainly principle," and the other proceeds via nonlinear, anharmonic effects due to zero-point fluctuations. We argue that neither suggestion is acceptable.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	2806-2807
Number of pages	2
Journal	Physical Review A
Volume	9
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.9.2806
State	Published - 1974

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

Access to Document

10.1103/PhysRevA.9.2806

Cite this

@article{094c7474394640589077c8c78fffc82e,

title = "Comment on some proposed mechanisms for attenuation of third sound",

abstract = "Two explanations have been proposed for an apparent discrepancy between theoretical prediction and experimental measurement of third-sound attenuation. One of these proposes a new {"}macroscopic quantum uncertainly principle,{"} and the other proceeds via nonlinear, anharmonic effects due to zero-point fluctuations. We argue that neither suggestion is acceptable.",

author = "Cole, \{M. W.\} and Goodstein, \{D. L.\}",

year = "1974",

doi = "10.1103/PhysRevA.9.2806",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "9",

pages = "2806--2807",

journal = "Physical Review A",

issn = "1050-2947",

publisher = "American Physical Society",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comment on some proposed mechanisms for attenuation of third sound

AU - Cole, M. W.

AU - Goodstein, D. L.

PY - 1974

Y1 - 1974

N2 - Two explanations have been proposed for an apparent discrepancy between theoretical prediction and experimental measurement of third-sound attenuation. One of these proposes a new "macroscopic quantum uncertainly principle," and the other proceeds via nonlinear, anharmonic effects due to zero-point fluctuations. We argue that neither suggestion is acceptable.

AB - Two explanations have been proposed for an apparent discrepancy between theoretical prediction and experimental measurement of third-sound attenuation. One of these proposes a new "macroscopic quantum uncertainly principle," and the other proceeds via nonlinear, anharmonic effects due to zero-point fluctuations. We argue that neither suggestion is acceptable.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/24444447410

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/24444447410#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevA.9.2806

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevA.9.2806

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:24444447410

SN - 1050-2947

VL - 9

SP - 2806

EP - 2807

JO - Physical Review A

JF - Physical Review A

IS - 6

ER -

Comment on some proposed mechanisms for attenuation of third sound

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this