Abstract
Two explanations have been proposed for an apparent discrepancy between theoretical prediction and experimental measurement of third-sound attenuation. One of these proposes a new "macroscopic quantum uncertainly principle," and the other proceeds via nonlinear, anharmonic effects due to zero-point fluctuations. We argue that neither suggestion is acceptable.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2806-2807 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1974 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comment on some proposed mechanisms for attenuation of third sound'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver