TY - JOUR
T1 - Common Variants in Lipid Metabolism-Related Genes Associate with Fat Mass Changes in Response to Dietary Monounsaturated Fatty Acids in Adults with Abdominal Obesity
AU - Hammad, Shatha S.
AU - Eck, Peter
AU - Sihag, Jyoti
AU - Chen, Xiang
AU - Connelly, Philip W.
AU - Lamarche, Benoît
AU - Couture, Patrick
AU - Guay, Valérie
AU - Maltais-Giguère, Julie
AU - West, Sheila G.
AU - Kris-Etherton, Penny M.
AU - Bowen, Kate J.
AU - Jenkins, David J.A.
AU - Taylor, Carla G.
AU - Perera, Danielle
AU - Wilson, Angela
AU - Castillo, Sandra
AU - Zahradka, Peter
AU - Jones, Peter J.H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Society for Nutrition. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/10/1
Y1 - 2019/10/1
N2 - Background: Different fatty acids (FAs) can vary in their obesogenic effect, and genetic makeup can contribute to fat deposition in response to dietary FA composition. However, the antiobesogenic effects of the interactions between dietary MUFAs and genetics have scarcely been tested in intervention studies. Objective: We evaluated the overall (primary outcome) and genetically modulated (secondary outcome) response in body weight and fat mass to different levels of MUFA consumption. Methods: In the Canola Oil Multicenter Intervention Trial II, a randomized, crossover, isocaloric, controlled-feeding multicenter trial, 44 men and 71 women with a mean age of 44 y and an increased waist circumference (men ∼108 cm and women ∼102 cm) consumed each of 3 oils for 6 wk, separated by four 12-wk washout periods. Oils included 2 high-MUFA oils-conventional canola and high-oleic canola (<7% SFAs, >65% MUFAs)- A nd 1 low-MUFA/high-SFA oil blend (40.2% SFAs, 22.0% MUFAs). Body fat was measured using DXA. Five candidate single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were genotyped using qualitative PCR. Data were analyzed using a repeated measures mixed model. Results: No significant differences were observed in adiposity measures following the consumption of either high-MUFA diet compared with the low-MUFA/high-SFA treatment. However, when stratified by genotype, 3 SNPs within lipoprotein lipase (LPL), adiponectin, and apoE genes influenced, separately, fat mass changes in response to treatment (n = 101). Mainly, the LPL rs13702-CC genotype was associated with lower visceral fat (high-MUFA:-216.2 ± 58.6 g; low-MUFA: 17.2 ± 81.1 g; P = 0.017) and android fat mass (high-MUFA:-267.3 ± 76.4 g; low-MUFA:-21.7 ± 102.2 g; P = 0.037) following average consumption of the 2 high-MUFA diets. Conclusions: Common variants in LPL, adiponectin, and apoE genes modulated body fat mass response to dietary MUFAs in an isocaloric diet in adults with abdominal obesity. These findings might eventually help in developing personalized dietary recommendations for weight control.
AB - Background: Different fatty acids (FAs) can vary in their obesogenic effect, and genetic makeup can contribute to fat deposition in response to dietary FA composition. However, the antiobesogenic effects of the interactions between dietary MUFAs and genetics have scarcely been tested in intervention studies. Objective: We evaluated the overall (primary outcome) and genetically modulated (secondary outcome) response in body weight and fat mass to different levels of MUFA consumption. Methods: In the Canola Oil Multicenter Intervention Trial II, a randomized, crossover, isocaloric, controlled-feeding multicenter trial, 44 men and 71 women with a mean age of 44 y and an increased waist circumference (men ∼108 cm and women ∼102 cm) consumed each of 3 oils for 6 wk, separated by four 12-wk washout periods. Oils included 2 high-MUFA oils-conventional canola and high-oleic canola (<7% SFAs, >65% MUFAs)- A nd 1 low-MUFA/high-SFA oil blend (40.2% SFAs, 22.0% MUFAs). Body fat was measured using DXA. Five candidate single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were genotyped using qualitative PCR. Data were analyzed using a repeated measures mixed model. Results: No significant differences were observed in adiposity measures following the consumption of either high-MUFA diet compared with the low-MUFA/high-SFA treatment. However, when stratified by genotype, 3 SNPs within lipoprotein lipase (LPL), adiponectin, and apoE genes influenced, separately, fat mass changes in response to treatment (n = 101). Mainly, the LPL rs13702-CC genotype was associated with lower visceral fat (high-MUFA:-216.2 ± 58.6 g; low-MUFA: 17.2 ± 81.1 g; P = 0.017) and android fat mass (high-MUFA:-267.3 ± 76.4 g; low-MUFA:-21.7 ± 102.2 g; P = 0.037) following average consumption of the 2 high-MUFA diets. Conclusions: Common variants in LPL, adiponectin, and apoE genes modulated body fat mass response to dietary MUFAs in an isocaloric diet in adults with abdominal obesity. These findings might eventually help in developing personalized dietary recommendations for weight control.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072747066&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072747066&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jn/nxz136
DO - 10.1093/jn/nxz136
M3 - Article
C2 - 31291447
AN - SCOPUS:85072747066
SN - 0022-3166
VL - 149
SP - 1749
EP - 1756
JO - Journal of Nutrition
JF - Journal of Nutrition
IS - 10
ER -