TY - JOUR
T1 - Communication in AI-assisted teams during an interdisciplinary drone design problem
AU - Gyory, Joshua T.
AU - Song, Binyang
AU - Cagan, Jonathan
AU - McComb, Christopher
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency through cooperative agreement N66001-17-1-4064.544545. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors. The experimental platform used in this work is available at https://github.com/hyform.
Publisher Copyright:
© ICED 2021.All right reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Human-artificial intelligent (AI) - assisted teaming is becoming a strategy for coalescing the complementary strengths of humans and computers to solve difficult tasks. Yet, there is still much to learn regarding how the integration of humans with AI agents into a team affects human behavior. Accordingly, this work begins to inform this research gap by focusing specifically on how the communication structure and interaction changes within AI-assisted human teams. The underlying discourse data for this work originates from a prior research study in which teams solve an interdisciplinary drone design and path-planning problem. Several metrics are employed in this work to study team discourse, including count, diversity, content richness, and semantic coherence. Results show significant differences in communication behavior in AI-assisted teams including more diversity and frequency in communication, more exchange of information regarding principal design parameters and problem-solving strategies, and more cohesion. Overall, this work takes meaningful steps towards understanding the effects of AI agents on human behavior in teams, critical for fully building effective human-AI hybrid teams in the future.
AB - Human-artificial intelligent (AI) - assisted teaming is becoming a strategy for coalescing the complementary strengths of humans and computers to solve difficult tasks. Yet, there is still much to learn regarding how the integration of humans with AI agents into a team affects human behavior. Accordingly, this work begins to inform this research gap by focusing specifically on how the communication structure and interaction changes within AI-assisted human teams. The underlying discourse data for this work originates from a prior research study in which teams solve an interdisciplinary drone design and path-planning problem. Several metrics are employed in this work to study team discourse, including count, diversity, content richness, and semantic coherence. Results show significant differences in communication behavior in AI-assisted teams including more diversity and frequency in communication, more exchange of information regarding principal design parameters and problem-solving strategies, and more cohesion. Overall, this work takes meaningful steps towards understanding the effects of AI agents on human behavior in teams, critical for fully building effective human-AI hybrid teams in the future.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117794882&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85117794882&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/pds.2021.65
DO - 10.1017/pds.2021.65
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85117794882
SN - 2732-527X
VL - 1
SP - 651
EP - 660
JO - Proceedings of the Design Society
JF - Proceedings of the Design Society
T2 - 23rd International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 2021
Y2 - 16 August 2021 through 20 August 2021
ER -