Communication in bargaining games with unanimity

Marina Agranov, Chloe Tergiman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations


Communication has been shown to increase proposer power in multilateral bargaining settings that use majority voting rule via competition between non-proposers for a place in the coalition. In this paper we investigate whether communication affects bargaining outcomes and the bargaining process in settings in which the competition effect is not present. We study committees that use unanimity rule to pass allocations. We find that in these settings, communication has the complete opposite effect compared with the majority settings: under unanimity, communication eliminates the inefficiencies that are present in settings without communication and it shifts bargaining outcomes towards egalitarian allocations with no proposer power. Communication logs provide insights regarding the topics subjects discuss and communication content correlates with bargaining outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)350-368
Number of pages19
JournalExperimental Economics
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 15 2019

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)


Dive into the research topics of 'Communication in bargaining games with unanimity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this