TY - JOUR
T1 - Communication in multilateral bargaining
AU - Agranov, Marina
AU - Tergiman, Chloe
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge that this research was generously supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council as well as the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation Grant GBMF#1158 (“Experimentation with Large, Diverse and Interconnected Socio-Economic Systems”). We would also like to thank Ernesto Dal Bo, Pedro Dal Bo, Timothy Feddersen, Guillaume Frechette, Alessandro Lizerri, John Ledyard, Rebecca Morton, Muriel Niederle, Salvatore Nunnari, Erkut Ozbay, Thomas Palfrey, Al Roth, Emanuel Vespa, Alistair Wilson, Leeat Yariv, the seminar participants at the Pennsylvania State University, Caltech, UBC, Stanford and UCSD, the conference participants at ESA (Tucson and New York), SITE, and Public Choice for helpful comments and discussions.
PY - 2014/10
Y1 - 2014/10
N2 - One of the most robust phenomena in the experimental literature on multilateral bargaining is the failure of proposers to extract equilibrium rents. However, all previous experiments have overlooked the fact that outside the lab committee members are allowed to - and do - engage in sometimes intense communication processes prior to voting on a proposal. We conduct an experimental test of the Baron-Ferejohn model in which we allow committee members to engage in unrestricted cheap-talk communication before a proposal is submitted. We find that proposers extract a significantly higher share of resources when communication is allowed. Communication increases proposer power through two channels. First, it mitigates the uncertainty surrounding the amount a coalition member is willing to accept. Second, it allows potential coalition members to compete for a place in the coalition by lowering this stated price.
AB - One of the most robust phenomena in the experimental literature on multilateral bargaining is the failure of proposers to extract equilibrium rents. However, all previous experiments have overlooked the fact that outside the lab committee members are allowed to - and do - engage in sometimes intense communication processes prior to voting on a proposal. We conduct an experimental test of the Baron-Ferejohn model in which we allow committee members to engage in unrestricted cheap-talk communication before a proposal is submitted. We find that proposers extract a significantly higher share of resources when communication is allowed. Communication increases proposer power through two channels. First, it mitigates the uncertainty surrounding the amount a coalition member is willing to accept. Second, it allows potential coalition members to compete for a place in the coalition by lowering this stated price.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904545763&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904545763&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.06.006
DO - 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.06.006
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84904545763
SN - 0047-2727
VL - 118
SP - 75
EP - 85
JO - Journal of Public Economics
JF - Journal of Public Economics
ER -