TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative mechanical activation mapping of RV pacing to LBBB by 2D and 3D speckle tracking and association with response to resynchronization therapy
AU - Gorcsan, John
AU - Tanaka, Hidekazu
AU - Hara, Hideyuki
AU - Adelstein, Evan C.
AU - Schwartzman, David
AU - Saba, Samir
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors are grateful for the support of the entire staff of the echocardiography and electrophysiology laboratories of the University of Pittsburgh Presbyterian University Hospital .
PY - 2010/5
Y1 - 2010/5
N2 - Objectives: The goals of this study were to compare patterns of mechanical activation in patients with chronic right ventricular (RV) pacing with those with left bundle branch block (LBBB) using 2-dimensional and novel 3-dimensional speckle tracking, and to compare ejection fraction (EF) response and long-term survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Background: Several randomized CRT trials have excluded patients with chronic RV pacing, and current guidelines for CRT include patients with intrinsically widened QRS, typically LBBB. Methods: We studied 308 patients who were referred for CRT: 227 had LBBB, 81 were RV paced. Dyssynchrony was assessed by tissue Doppler, routine pulsed Doppler, and 2-dimensional speckle-tracking radial strain. 3D strain was assessed using speckle tracking from a pyramidal dataset in a subset of 57 patients for mechanical activation mapping. Survival after CRT was compared with survival in a group of 46 patients with attempted, but failed, CRT. Results: Patients with chronic RV pacing and LBBB had similar intraventricular dyssynchrony, with opposing wall delays by tissue Doppler of 82 ± 45 ms versus 87 ± 63 ms and anteroseptum-to-posterior delays by speckle tracking of 225 ± 142 ms, versus 211 ± 107 ms, respectively. RV-paced patients, however, had greater interventricular dyssynchrony: 44 ± 24 ms versus 35 ± 21 ms (p < 0.01), which correlated with their greater QRS duration (p < 0.001). Sites of latest mechanical activation were most often posterior or lateral in both groups, but RV-paced patients had sites of earliest activation more often from the inferior-septum and apex (p < 0.05). EF response was similar in RV-paced and LBBB groups, and survival free from transplantation or mechanical support after CRT was similarly favorable as compared with failed CRT patients over 5 years (p < 0.01). Conclusions: RV-paced patients, when compared with LBBB patients, had similar dyssynchronous patterns of mechanical activation and greater interventricular dyssynchrony. Importantly, RV-paced patients had similar EF response and long-term outcome as those with LBBB, which supports their candidacy for CRT.
AB - Objectives: The goals of this study were to compare patterns of mechanical activation in patients with chronic right ventricular (RV) pacing with those with left bundle branch block (LBBB) using 2-dimensional and novel 3-dimensional speckle tracking, and to compare ejection fraction (EF) response and long-term survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Background: Several randomized CRT trials have excluded patients with chronic RV pacing, and current guidelines for CRT include patients with intrinsically widened QRS, typically LBBB. Methods: We studied 308 patients who were referred for CRT: 227 had LBBB, 81 were RV paced. Dyssynchrony was assessed by tissue Doppler, routine pulsed Doppler, and 2-dimensional speckle-tracking radial strain. 3D strain was assessed using speckle tracking from a pyramidal dataset in a subset of 57 patients for mechanical activation mapping. Survival after CRT was compared with survival in a group of 46 patients with attempted, but failed, CRT. Results: Patients with chronic RV pacing and LBBB had similar intraventricular dyssynchrony, with opposing wall delays by tissue Doppler of 82 ± 45 ms versus 87 ± 63 ms and anteroseptum-to-posterior delays by speckle tracking of 225 ± 142 ms, versus 211 ± 107 ms, respectively. RV-paced patients, however, had greater interventricular dyssynchrony: 44 ± 24 ms versus 35 ± 21 ms (p < 0.01), which correlated with their greater QRS duration (p < 0.001). Sites of latest mechanical activation were most often posterior or lateral in both groups, but RV-paced patients had sites of earliest activation more often from the inferior-septum and apex (p < 0.05). EF response was similar in RV-paced and LBBB groups, and survival free from transplantation or mechanical support after CRT was similarly favorable as compared with failed CRT patients over 5 years (p < 0.01). Conclusions: RV-paced patients, when compared with LBBB patients, had similar dyssynchronous patterns of mechanical activation and greater interventricular dyssynchrony. Importantly, RV-paced patients had similar EF response and long-term outcome as those with LBBB, which supports their candidacy for CRT.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954831409&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954831409&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.12.014
DO - 10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.12.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 20466341
AN - SCOPUS:77954831409
SN - 1936-878X
VL - 3
SP - 461
EP - 471
JO - JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
JF - JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
IS - 5
ER -