Abstract
Four different methods (TEOM, TPO-IR, TPD-IR, and TPO-TGA) were used comparatively for more accurate and reliable measurements of carbon formation on used Ni/Al2O3 reforming catalysts with and without Ca-promotion. TPO-TGA could not discriminate carbon burn off and Ni oxidation, especially when only a trace amount of carbon was formed that needs to be detected. TEOM was run on-line during methane reforming, it could avoid any other effects besides the reforming reactions. There was a fairly good correlation between the two techniques. The un-promoted C11-9-09 showed a better consistence between the two methods, noting that the slope of the linear trend line is very close to 1, while G-91 showed larger amount of carbon detected by TEOM than by TPO-IR.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 801-803 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | ACS Division of Fuel Chemistry, Preprints |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| State | Published - Sep 2003 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Energy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative study of carbon formation on supported in catalysts during CH4 reforming using TEOM, TPO-IR, TPD-IR and TGA techniques'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver