Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparing cancer detection rates of patients undergoing short term follow-up vs routine follow-up after benign breast biopsies, is follow-up needed?

  • Donna M. Plecha
  • , Courtney Garlick
  • , Christina Dubchuck
  • , Cheryl Thompson
  • , Niki Constantinou

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Purpose To compare cancer rates after benign breast biopsies between patients with short term imaging follow-up (STFU) and those with routine follow-up (RFU). Materials & methods Retrospective review of benign stereotactic, US or DCE-MRI breast biopsies. Results Of 580 lesions, 192 (33%) had STFU, and 388 (67%) had RFU. For US and mammographic detected lesions, there is no difference in cancer rates between the STFU (1 cancer, n = 148) and the RFU group (0 cancer, n = 365) (p = 0.29). There were 2 cancers in the STFU group versus 0 in the RFU DCE-MRI group (p = 0.54). Conclusion Our results support RFU after benign ultrasound and stereotactic breast biopsies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)37-42
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Imaging
Volume42
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing cancer detection rates of patients undergoing short term follow-up vs routine follow-up after benign breast biopsies, is follow-up needed?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this