Comparing different moving target defense techniques

Jun Xu; Pinyao Guo; Mingyi Zhao; Robert F. Erbacher; Minghui Zhu; Peng Liu

doi:10.1145/2663474.2663486

Comparing different moving target defense techniques

Jun Xu, Pinyao Guo, Mingyi Zhao, Robert F. Erbacher, Minghui Zhu, Peng Liu

Research output: Contribution to journal › Conference article › peer-review

87 Scopus citations

Abstract

Moving Target Defense techniques have been proposed to increase uncertainty and apparent complexity for attackers. When more than one Moving Target Defense techniques are effective to limit opportunities of an attack, it is required to compare these techniques and select the best defense choice. In this paper, we propose a three-layer model to evaluate and compare effectiveness of different Moving Target De- fenses. This model is designed as an attempt to fill a gap among existing evaluation methods and works as a systematic framework for Moving Target Defense comparison.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	97-107
Number of pages	11
Journal	Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security
Volume	2014-November
Issue number	November
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1145/2663474.2663486
State	Published - Nov 7 2014
Event	1st ACM Workshop on Moving Target Defense, MTD 2014 - Co-located with 21st ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, CCS 2014 - Scottsdale, United States Duration: Nov 3 2014 → …

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Software
Computer Networks and Communications

Access to Document

10.1145/2663474.2663486

Cite this

@article{ec4f45375f304e4eb6410ad6b2ee8656,

title = "Comparing different moving target defense techniques",

abstract = "Moving Target Defense techniques have been proposed to increase uncertainty and apparent complexity for attackers. When more than one Moving Target Defense techniques are effective to limit opportunities of an attack, it is required to compare these techniques and select the best defense choice. In this paper, we propose a three-layer model to evaluate and compare effectiveness of different Moving Target De- fenses. This model is designed as an attempt to fill a gap among existing evaluation methods and works as a systematic framework for Moving Target Defense comparison.",

author = "Jun Xu and Pinyao Guo and Mingyi Zhao and Erbacher, {Robert F.} and Minghui Zhu and Peng Liu",

year = "2014",

month = nov,

day = "7",

doi = "10.1145/2663474.2663486",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "2014-November",

pages = "97--107",

journal = "Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security",

issn = "1543-7221",

publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)",

number = "November",

note = "1st ACM Workshop on Moving Target Defense, MTD 2014 - Co-located with 21st ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, CCS 2014 ; Conference date: 03-11-2014",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing different moving target defense techniques

AU - Xu, Jun

AU - Guo, Pinyao

AU - Zhao, Mingyi

AU - Erbacher, Robert F.

AU - Zhu, Minghui

AU - Liu, Peng

PY - 2014/11/7

Y1 - 2014/11/7

N2 - Moving Target Defense techniques have been proposed to increase uncertainty and apparent complexity for attackers. When more than one Moving Target Defense techniques are effective to limit opportunities of an attack, it is required to compare these techniques and select the best defense choice. In this paper, we propose a three-layer model to evaluate and compare effectiveness of different Moving Target De- fenses. This model is designed as an attempt to fill a gap among existing evaluation methods and works as a systematic framework for Moving Target Defense comparison.

AB - Moving Target Defense techniques have been proposed to increase uncertainty and apparent complexity for attackers. When more than one Moving Target Defense techniques are effective to limit opportunities of an attack, it is required to compare these techniques and select the best defense choice. In this paper, we propose a three-layer model to evaluate and compare effectiveness of different Moving Target De- fenses. This model is designed as an attempt to fill a gap among existing evaluation methods and works as a systematic framework for Moving Target Defense comparison.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937675431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937675431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/2663474.2663486

DO - 10.1145/2663474.2663486

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:84937675431

SN - 1543-7221

VL - 2014-November

SP - 97

EP - 107

JO - Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security

JF - Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security

IS - November

T2 - 1st ACM Workshop on Moving Target Defense, MTD 2014 - Co-located with 21st ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, CCS 2014

Y2 - 3 November 2014

ER -

Comparing different moving target defense techniques

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this