TY - GEN
T1 - Comparison of center nozzle staging to outer nozzle staging in a multi-flame combustor
AU - Culler, Wyatt
AU - Chen, Xiaoling
AU - Peluso, Stephen
AU - Santavicca, Domenic
AU - O'Connor, Jacqueline
AU - Noble, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2018 ASME
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Combustion instability in gas turbines is often mitigated using fuel staging, a strategy where the fuel is split unevenly between different nozzles of a multiple-nozzle combustor. This work examines the efficacy of different fuel staging configurations by comparing axisymmetric and non-axisymmetric fuel staging in a four-around-one model gas turbine combustor. Fuel staging is accomplished by increasing the equivalence ratio of the center nozzle (axisymmetric staging) or an outer nozzle (non-axisymmetric staging). When the global equivalence ratio is φ = 0.70 and all nozzles are fueled equally, the combustor undergoes longitudinal, self-excited oscillations. These oscillations are suppressed when the center nozzle equivalence ratio is increased above φStaging = 0.79. This bifurcation equivalence ratio varies between φStaging = 0.86 and φStaging = 0.76 for the outer nozzles, and is attributed to minor hardware differences between each nozzle. High speed CH* chemiluminescence images in combination with dynamic pressure measurements are used to determine the instantaneous phase difference between the heat release rate fluctuation and the combustor pressure fluctuation throughout the combustor. This analysis shows that the staged flame has similar phase relationships for all staging configurations. It is found that axisymmetric staging can be as effective as non-axisymmetric staging; however, the aforementioned hardware variations can impact both the bifurcation equivalence ratio and the effectiveness of staging.
AB - Combustion instability in gas turbines is often mitigated using fuel staging, a strategy where the fuel is split unevenly between different nozzles of a multiple-nozzle combustor. This work examines the efficacy of different fuel staging configurations by comparing axisymmetric and non-axisymmetric fuel staging in a four-around-one model gas turbine combustor. Fuel staging is accomplished by increasing the equivalence ratio of the center nozzle (axisymmetric staging) or an outer nozzle (non-axisymmetric staging). When the global equivalence ratio is φ = 0.70 and all nozzles are fueled equally, the combustor undergoes longitudinal, self-excited oscillations. These oscillations are suppressed when the center nozzle equivalence ratio is increased above φStaging = 0.79. This bifurcation equivalence ratio varies between φStaging = 0.86 and φStaging = 0.76 for the outer nozzles, and is attributed to minor hardware differences between each nozzle. High speed CH* chemiluminescence images in combination with dynamic pressure measurements are used to determine the instantaneous phase difference between the heat release rate fluctuation and the combustor pressure fluctuation throughout the combustor. This analysis shows that the staged flame has similar phase relationships for all staging configurations. It is found that axisymmetric staging can be as effective as non-axisymmetric staging; however, the aforementioned hardware variations can impact both the bifurcation equivalence ratio and the effectiveness of staging.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048580876&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048580876&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/GT201875423
DO - 10.1115/GT201875423
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85048580876
SN - 9780791851050
T3 - Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo
BT - Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions
PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
T2 - ASME Turbo Expo 2018: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, GT 2018
Y2 - 11 June 2018 through 15 June 2018
ER -