Comparison of experimental and simulated low-pressure CHF tests using CTF and RELAP5-3D

Jacob P. Gorton; Nicholas R. Brown; Soon Kyu Lee; Youho Lee

Comparison of experimental and simulated low-pressure CHF tests using CTF and RELAP5-3D

Jacob P. Gorton, Nicholas R. Brown, Soon Kyu Lee, Youho Lee

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review

Abstract

We present the results of a preliminary comparison of low-pressure transient critical heat flux (CHF) tests conducted in a closed tube test section and best-estimate simulation results. We compare low-pressure experimental CHF test results for stainless steel 316 (SS316) and Inconel 600 test sections to results predicted by models developed in two widely-used thermal hydraulics codes; the system code RELAP5-3D and the Consortium for Advanced Simulation of LWRs (CASL) version of CTF. The objective of the comparison was to determine how well the models would predict CHF and post-CHF tube temperatures and rewetting behavior. The RELAP5-3D and CTF models conservatively predicted the heat flux at which CHF was exceeded for the SS316 models, but both codes showed that CHF was exceeded at a greater heat flux than in the experiment for the Inconel 600 case. RELAP5-3D and CTF overpredicted the post-CHF tube temperature in the SS316 model but underpredicted the Inconel tube temperature, thus demonstrating the need for improved CHF and post-CHF prediction methods for various materials.

Original language	English (US)
Pages	1022-1027
Number of pages	6
State	Published - 2018
Event	International Topical Meeting on Advances in Thermal Hydraulics 2018, ATH 2018 - Held in conjunction with the 2018 American Nuclear Society (ANS) Winter Meeting - Orlando, United States Duration: Nov 11 2018 → Nov 15 2018

Other

Other	International Topical Meeting on Advances in Thermal Hydraulics 2018, ATH 2018 - Held in conjunction with the 2018 American Nuclear Society (ANS) Winter Meeting
Country/Territory	United States
City	Orlando
Period	11/11/18 → 11/15/18

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Nuclear Energy and Engineering
Nuclear and High Energy Physics

Cite this

@conference{4df4f06613d6496b90ef7d9d3a11a4b6,

title = "Comparison of experimental and simulated low-pressure CHF tests using CTF and RELAP5-3D",

abstract = "We present the results of a preliminary comparison of low-pressure transient critical heat flux (CHF) tests conducted in a closed tube test section and best-estimate simulation results. We compare low-pressure experimental CHF test results for stainless steel 316 (SS316) and Inconel 600 test sections to results predicted by models developed in two widely-used thermal hydraulics codes; the system code RELAP5-3D and the Consortium for Advanced Simulation of LWRs (CASL) version of CTF. The objective of the comparison was to determine how well the models would predict CHF and post-CHF tube temperatures and rewetting behavior. The RELAP5-3D and CTF models conservatively predicted the heat flux at which CHF was exceeded for the SS316 models, but both codes showed that CHF was exceeded at a greater heat flux than in the experiment for the Inconel 600 case. RELAP5-3D and CTF overpredicted the post-CHF tube temperature in the SS316 model but underpredicted the Inconel tube temperature, thus demonstrating the need for improved CHF and post-CHF prediction methods for various materials.",

author = "Gorton, {Jacob P.} and Brown, {Nicholas R.} and Lee, {Soon Kyu} and Youho Lee",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018 International Topical Meeting on Advances in Thermal Hydraulics, ATH 2018 - Embedded Topical Meeting. All rights reserved.; International Topical Meeting on Advances in Thermal Hydraulics 2018, ATH 2018 - Held in conjunction with the 2018 American Nuclear Society (ANS) Winter Meeting ; Conference date: 11-11-2018 Through 15-11-2018",

year = "2018",

language = "English (US)",

pages = "1022--1027",

}

Gorton, JP, Brown, NR, Lee, SK & Lee, Y 2018, 'Comparison of experimental and simulated low-pressure CHF tests using CTF and RELAP5-3D', Paper presented at International Topical Meeting on Advances in Thermal Hydraulics 2018, ATH 2018 - Held in conjunction with the 2018 American Nuclear Society (ANS) Winter Meeting, Orlando, United States, 11/11/18 - 11/15/18 pp. 1022-1027.

Comparison of experimental and simulated low-pressure CHF tests using CTF and RELAP5-3D. / Gorton, Jacob P.; Brown, Nicholas R.; Lee, Soon Kyu et al.
2018. 1022-1027 Paper presented at International Topical Meeting on Advances in Thermal Hydraulics 2018, ATH 2018 - Held in conjunction with the 2018 American Nuclear Society (ANS) Winter Meeting, Orlando, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - Comparison of experimental and simulated low-pressure CHF tests using CTF and RELAP5-3D

AU - Gorton, Jacob P.

AU - Brown, Nicholas R.

AU - Lee, Soon Kyu

AU - Lee, Youho

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - We present the results of a preliminary comparison of low-pressure transient critical heat flux (CHF) tests conducted in a closed tube test section and best-estimate simulation results. We compare low-pressure experimental CHF test results for stainless steel 316 (SS316) and Inconel 600 test sections to results predicted by models developed in two widely-used thermal hydraulics codes; the system code RELAP5-3D and the Consortium for Advanced Simulation of LWRs (CASL) version of CTF. The objective of the comparison was to determine how well the models would predict CHF and post-CHF tube temperatures and rewetting behavior. The RELAP5-3D and CTF models conservatively predicted the heat flux at which CHF was exceeded for the SS316 models, but both codes showed that CHF was exceeded at a greater heat flux than in the experiment for the Inconel 600 case. RELAP5-3D and CTF overpredicted the post-CHF tube temperature in the SS316 model but underpredicted the Inconel tube temperature, thus demonstrating the need for improved CHF and post-CHF prediction methods for various materials.

AB - We present the results of a preliminary comparison of low-pressure transient critical heat flux (CHF) tests conducted in a closed tube test section and best-estimate simulation results. We compare low-pressure experimental CHF test results for stainless steel 316 (SS316) and Inconel 600 test sections to results predicted by models developed in two widely-used thermal hydraulics codes; the system code RELAP5-3D and the Consortium for Advanced Simulation of LWRs (CASL) version of CTF. The objective of the comparison was to determine how well the models would predict CHF and post-CHF tube temperatures and rewetting behavior. The RELAP5-3D and CTF models conservatively predicted the heat flux at which CHF was exceeded for the SS316 models, but both codes showed that CHF was exceeded at a greater heat flux than in the experiment for the Inconel 600 case. RELAP5-3D and CTF overpredicted the post-CHF tube temperature in the SS316 model but underpredicted the Inconel tube temperature, thus demonstrating the need for improved CHF and post-CHF prediction methods for various materials.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060158555&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060158555&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Paper

AN - SCOPUS:85060158555

SP - 1022

EP - 1027

T2 - International Topical Meeting on Advances in Thermal Hydraulics 2018, ATH 2018 - Held in conjunction with the 2018 American Nuclear Society (ANS) Winter Meeting

Y2 - 11 November 2018 through 15 November 2018

ER -

Comparison of experimental and simulated low-pressure CHF tests using CTF and RELAP5-3D

Abstract

Other

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this