Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of infection rate with the use of antibiotic-impregnated vs standard extraventricular drainage devices: A prospective, randomized controlled trial

  • Ian Pople
  • , Wai Poon
  • , Richard Assaker
  • , David Mathieu
  • , Mark Iantosca
  • , Ernest Wang
  • , Li Wei Zhang
  • , Gilberto Leung
  • , Paul Chumas
  • , Philippe Menei
  • , Laurent Beydon
  • , Mark Hamilton
  • , Ian Kamaly
  • , Stephen Lewis
  • , Wang Ning
  • , J. Thomas Megerian
  • , Matthew J. McGirt
  • , Jeffrey A. Murphy
  • , Aileen Michael
  • , Torstein Meling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: External ventricular drainage (EVD) catheters provide reliable and accurate means of monitoring intracranial pressure and alleviating elevated pressures via drainage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). CSF infections occur in approximately 9% of patients. Antibiotic-impregnated (AI) EVD catheters were developed with the goal of reducing the occurrence of EVD catheter-related CSF infections and their associated complications. OBJECTIVE: To present an international, prospective, randomized, open-label trial to evaluate infection incidence of AI vs standard EVD catheters. METHODS: Infection was defined as (1) proven infection, positive CSF culture and positive Gram stain or (2) suspected infection: (A) positive CSF culture with no organisms identified on initial Gram stain; (B) negative CSF culture with a gram-positive or -negative stain; (C) CSF leukocytosis with a white blood cell/red blood cell count >0.02. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty-four patients underwent implantation of an EVD catheter. One hundred seventy-six patients in the AI-EVD cohort and 181 in the standard EVD catheter cohort were eligible for evaluation of infection. The 2 groups were similar in all clinical characteristics. Proven infection was documented in 9 (2.5%) patients (AI: 4 [2.3%] vs standard: 5 [2.8%], P = 1.0). Suspected infection was documented in 31 (17.6%) patients receiving AI and 37 (20.4%) patients receiving standard EVD catheters, P = .504. Duration of time to suspected infection was prolonged in the AI cohort (8.8 ± 6.1 days) compared with the standard EVD cohort (4.6 ± 4.2 days), P = .002. CONCLUSION: AI-EVD catheters were associated with an extremely low rate of catheter-related infections. AI catheters were not associated with risk reduction in EVD infection compared to standard catheters. Use of AI-EVD catheters is a safe option for a wide variety of patients requiring CSF drainage and monitoring, but the efficacy of AI-EVD catheters was not supported in this trial.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)6-13
Number of pages8
JournalNeurosurgery
Volume71
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2012

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of infection rate with the use of antibiotic-impregnated vs standard extraventricular drainage devices: A prospective, randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this