TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of interfinger connection matrix computation techniques
AU - Martin, Joel R.
AU - Terekhov, Alexander V.
AU - Latash, Mark L.
AU - Zatsiorsky, Vladimir M.
PY - 2013/10
Y1 - 2013/10
N2 - A hypothesis was proposed that the central nervous system controls force production by the fingers through hypothetical neural commands. The neural commands are scaled between values of 0 to 1, indicating no intentional force production or maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) force production, respectively. A matrix of interfinger connections transforms neural commands into finger forces. Two methods have been proposed to compute the interfinger connection matrix. The first method uses only single finger MVC trials and multiplies the interfinger connection matrix by a gain factor. The second method uses a neural network model based on experimental data. The performance of the two methods was compared on the MVC data and on a data set of submaximal forces, collected over a range of total forces and moments of force. The methods were compared in terms of (1) ability to predict finger forces, (2) accuracy of neural command reconstruction, and (3) preserved planarity of force data for submaximal force production task. Both methods did a reasonable job of predicting the total force in multifinger MVC trials; however, the neural network model performed better in regards to all other criteria. Overall, the results indicate that for modeling multifinger interaction the neural network method is preferable.
AB - A hypothesis was proposed that the central nervous system controls force production by the fingers through hypothetical neural commands. The neural commands are scaled between values of 0 to 1, indicating no intentional force production or maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) force production, respectively. A matrix of interfinger connections transforms neural commands into finger forces. Two methods have been proposed to compute the interfinger connection matrix. The first method uses only single finger MVC trials and multiplies the interfinger connection matrix by a gain factor. The second method uses a neural network model based on experimental data. The performance of the two methods was compared on the MVC data and on a data set of submaximal forces, collected over a range of total forces and moments of force. The methods were compared in terms of (1) ability to predict finger forces, (2) accuracy of neural command reconstruction, and (3) preserved planarity of force data for submaximal force production task. Both methods did a reasonable job of predicting the total force in multifinger MVC trials; however, the neural network model performed better in regards to all other criteria. Overall, the results indicate that for modeling multifinger interaction the neural network method is preferable.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888808014&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888808014&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1123/jab.29.5.525
DO - 10.1123/jab.29.5.525
M3 - Article
C2 - 23183029
AN - SCOPUS:84888808014
SN - 1065-8483
VL - 29
SP - 525
EP - 534
JO - Journal of applied biomechanics
JF - Journal of applied biomechanics
IS - 5
ER -