Comparison of therapist implemented and iPad-assisted interventions for children with autism

Allyson Lee, Russell Lang, Katy Davenport, Melissa Moore, Mandy Rispoli, Larah Van Der Meer, Amarie Carnett, Tracy Raulston, Amy Tostanoski, Clare Chung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations


Objective: This study compares intervention delivered by a therapist to intervention delivered using an iPad for two children with autism. Further, this study evaluates the influence of choice between the conditions. Methods: Time on-task, challenging behaviour, session duration and correct responses were compared across conditions in an alternating treatment design. The effect of choice was evaluated in an ABAB design. Results: The iPad was associated with shorter intervention sessions, more time on-task and less challenging behaviour for one participant. There was no difference between conditions for the second participant. Both participants selected the iPad when given the choice and, although the effect of choice was modest, choosing was associated with more time on-task and less challenging behaviour. Conclusions: These data suggest that iPad-assisted intervention can be as effective as therapist-implemented intervention. Further, even for children for whom no differences between the interventions exist, offering a choice may be beneficial.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)97-103
Number of pages7
JournalDevelopmental Neurorehabilitation
Issue number2
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Rehabilitation
  • Developmental Neuroscience


Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of therapist implemented and iPad-assisted interventions for children with autism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this