@article{665ee3e58eae4c8d8cb9889741178c7e,
title = "Comparisons of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing builds through experimental in situ distortion and temperature measurements",
abstract = " In situ experimental measurements of the laser powder bed fusion build process are completed with the goal gaining insight into the evolution of distortion in the powder bed fusion build process. Utilizing a novel enclosed instrumented system, five experimental builds are performed. Experimental builds compare materials: Ti–6Al–4V and Inconel {\textregistered} 718, differing build geometries, and manufacturing machines: EOS M280 and Renishaw AM250. A combination of in situ measurements of distortion and temperature and post-build measurements of final part geometry are used to compare and contrast the different experiments. Experimental results show that builds completed using Inconel {\textregistered} 718 distort between 50% and 80% more relative to Ti–6Al–4V depending on substrate size and build geometry. The experimental build completed on the Renishaw AM250 distorted 10.6% more in the Z direction when compared with the identical build completed on the EOS M280 machine. Comparisons of post-build XY cross-sectional area show a 0.3% contraction from the predefined build geometry for the Renishaw AM250 as compared with the 4.5% contraction for the part built using the EOS M280. Recommendations and future work are also discussed.",
author = "Dunbar, {Alexander J.} and Denlinger, {Erik R.} and Gouge, {Michael F.} and Simpson, {Timothy W.} and Pan Michaleris",
note = "Funding Information: Laboratory activities conducted during this research were conducted at the Center for Innovative Materials Processing through Direct Digital Deposition at Penn State. The authors would like to thank Moog Inc. for help in planning design and execution of experiments for this work. This material is based on research sponsored by Air Force Research Laboratory under agreement number FA8650-12-2-7230 and by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, acting through the Department of Community and Economic Development, under Contract Number C000053981. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Governmental purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation thereon. Any opinions, views, findings, recommendations, and conclusions contained herein are those of the author(s) and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies or endorsements, either expressed or implied, of the Air Force Research Laboratory, the U.S. Government, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Carnegie Mellon University, or Lehigh University. The authors would like to thank Schlumberger-Doll Research for their support of this effort. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, and/or recommendations in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Schlumberger-Doll Research or its employees. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 Elsevier B.V.",
year = "2017",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.addma.2017.03.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "57--65",
journal = "Additive Manufacturing",
issn = "2214-8604",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
}