TY - JOUR
T1 - Compressive and Tensile Stress–Strain Responses of Additively Manufactured (AM) 304L Stainless Steel at High Strain Rates
AU - Song, B.
AU - Nishida, E.
AU - Sanborn, B.
AU - Maguire, M.
AU - Adams, D.
AU - Carroll, J.
AU - Wise, J.
AU - Reedlunn, B.
AU - Bishop, J.
AU - Palmer, T.
N1 - Funding Information:
for sample preparation and (B) McKenzie for SEM and EBSD. Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-mission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology and Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC., a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International, Inc., for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-NA-0003525.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc (outside the US).
PY - 2017/9/1
Y1 - 2017/9/1
N2 - Additively manufactured 304L stainless steel with different build orientations and post-manufacturing processes was dynamically characterized in compression and tension at various high strain rates (~500, 1500, and 3000 s−1) using Kolsky bar techniques. Wrought 304L stainless steel with a similar chemical composition as the additively manufactured material was also characterized at the same strain rates. The AM material exhibited higher yield and flow stresses in compression when the specimen strain is smaller than 0.3. In dynamic tension, the AM material also possessed higher yield and flow stresses but lower elongations to failure than the wrought material at all the strain rates tested. Depending on post processing and anisotropy, the high-rate yield strength of the AM 304L material is increased by 20–35%, compared to the yield strength of the wrought material.
AB - Additively manufactured 304L stainless steel with different build orientations and post-manufacturing processes was dynamically characterized in compression and tension at various high strain rates (~500, 1500, and 3000 s−1) using Kolsky bar techniques. Wrought 304L stainless steel with a similar chemical composition as the additively manufactured material was also characterized at the same strain rates. The AM material exhibited higher yield and flow stresses in compression when the specimen strain is smaller than 0.3. In dynamic tension, the AM material also possessed higher yield and flow stresses but lower elongations to failure than the wrought material at all the strain rates tested. Depending on post processing and anisotropy, the high-rate yield strength of the AM 304L material is increased by 20–35%, compared to the yield strength of the wrought material.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031412356&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031412356&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s40870-017-0122-6
DO - 10.1007/s40870-017-0122-6
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85031412356
SN - 2199-7446
VL - 3
SP - 412
EP - 425
JO - Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials
JF - Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials
IS - 3
ER -