Abstract
This article concerns the ways in which Afropessimist Calvin Warren misuses and overextends both Wynter's historiography of the Human and Hartman's concept "fungible commodity."First, Calvin Warren flattens the ontology of the political subject described in Wynter's concept "genres of Man"to argue that the contemporary Black US person exists as "being,"that is, non-being. Second, Warren misaligns with Wynter's account of the period of historical rupture between the Human and nonhuman. Whereas, for Wynter, this rupture was constituted by the colonial encounter in the Americas, Warren cites chattel slavery as the event wherein the Human and Other, specifically the Black Other, were torn apart. Third, Warren's use of "fungible commodity"when referencing the contemporary Black lacks a historiographical framework that would account for the continued non-being of Black existence as commodity post-emancipation.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 333-344 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Journal of Speculative Philosophy |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2023 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Conceptually Misaligned: Black Being, the Human, and Fungibility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver