Abstract
A new hypothesis (and supporting data) provides a solution to the 25- year-old paradox whereby positively reinforcing drugs of abuse also support a conditioned taste aversion (CTA). The results show that unlike LiCl-induced CTAs, morphine- and cocaine-induced suppression of conditioned stimulus (CS) intake depends on the rewarding properties of the gustatory CS. This finding argues the long-standing CTA interpretation in favor of a new reward comparison account. That is, rats decrease intake of a gustatory CS following taste-drug pairings because the value of the CS is outweighed by that of a highly reinforcing psychoactive drug. Suppression of CS intake, then, is a consequence of the well-documented positive reinforcing, rather than the hypothetical aversive, properties of drugs of abuse.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 129-136 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Behavioral Neuroscience |
| Volume | 111 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 1997 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Behavioral Neuroscience
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Conditioned taste aversion and drugs of abuse: A reinterpretation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver