Congenital Syphilis in the United States: A Narrative Review

Mahmoud M. Azqul, Stacey B. Griner, Casey N. Pinto

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Congenital syphilis (CS) continues to pose a significant global challenge. There has been a marked increase in reported cases in the US, with 102.5 cases per 100,000 live births in 2022 compared to 11.6 cases per 100,000 live births in 2014. CS can lead to a range of severe complications, including premature birth, intrauterine growth restriction, miscarriage, perinatal death, stillbirth, and postnatal complications that may persist into later life. Maternal/parental factors such as age, race/ethnicity, occupation, income level, access to healthcare services, and incarceration have been linked to higher rates of CS. Additionally, pregnant individuals who engage in high-risk behaviors such as sex work, having multiple sexual partners, or substance use are at a higher risk of exposure and subsequent infection. Routine screening for syphilis during pregnancy is crucial for its detection, timely management, and prevention of CS. The asymptomatic nature of the latent stage of syphilis further underscores the importance of prenatal syphilis screening. Studies in various countries have shown that early or first antenatal care visit screening for CS is cost-effective. This review article critically evaluates the current knowledge of CS in the US, including its prevalence, social determinants of health, prevention efforts, challenges, the significance of screening, and the call to action to address the rising trend.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002094
JournalSexually transmitted diseases
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2024

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dermatology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Congenital Syphilis in the United States: A Narrative Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this