TY - JOUR
T1 - Connections between the Market Pricing of Accruals Quality and Accounting-Based Anomalies*
AU - Du, Kai
AU - Jiang, Xin Daniel
N1 - Funding Information:
* Accepted by Partha Mohanram. We received many helpful suggestions from Partha Mohanram and two anonymous reviewers. For comments on various versions of the paper, we thank Vasiliki Athanasakou (discussant), Zhiwu Chen, Foong Soon Cheong, James Choi, Kent Daniel, Merle Ederhof, Jeremiah Green, Roger Ibbotson, Kalin Kolev, Alina Lerman, Dong Lou, Philip Ostromogolsky, Shyam Sunder, Jake Thomas, Michael Welker, Frank Zhang, Lu Zhang, Wei Zhu, and workshop participants at Yale School of Management and the 6th Symposium on Intelligent Investing at Ivey Business School, Western University. We acknowledge financial support from Pennsylvania State University. Kai Du also acknowledges financial support from the Deloitte Foundation Doctoral Fellowship and Yale University. † Corresponding author.
Publisher Copyright:
© CAAA
PY - 2020/12/1
Y1 - 2020/12/1
N2 - We examine whether prior findings on the market pricing of accruals quality (AQ) can be attributed to other forms of accounting-based anomalies. Using hedge portfolio analysis and cross-sectional regressions, we find that the return predictive power of AQ overlaps with several other accounting signals. We also find that, similar to other accounting-based anomalies, especially the accruals anomaly, the AQ pricing effect (i) is likely due to mispricing instead of risk pricing, (ii) is attenuated in recent years, and (iii) disappears among firms with cash flow forecasts or long-term growth forecasts. Our findings highlight the importance of controlling for existing return predictive signals when evaluating the market pricing of AQ.
AB - We examine whether prior findings on the market pricing of accruals quality (AQ) can be attributed to other forms of accounting-based anomalies. Using hedge portfolio analysis and cross-sectional regressions, we find that the return predictive power of AQ overlaps with several other accounting signals. We also find that, similar to other accounting-based anomalies, especially the accruals anomaly, the AQ pricing effect (i) is likely due to mispricing instead of risk pricing, (ii) is attenuated in recent years, and (iii) disappears among firms with cash flow forecasts or long-term growth forecasts. Our findings highlight the importance of controlling for existing return predictive signals when evaluating the market pricing of AQ.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089592380&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85089592380&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1911-3846.12589
DO - 10.1111/1911-3846.12589
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85089592380
SN - 0823-9150
VL - 37
SP - 2087
EP - 2119
JO - Contemporary Accounting Research
JF - Contemporary Accounting Research
IS - 4
ER -