Abstract
Previous research has suggested that an informed choice maintains or increases loyalty as a result of causing customers to share the responsibility for service failures. The research, however, was only with risky choices- high payoff with high chance of service failure. For example, a table with a good view, but in demand and in a busy section, may have slow service. Does an informed choice maintain or increase loyalty when the alternative chosen is a conservative choice-low payoff with low chance of service failure? If the effect is because of empowerment alone, it should not extend to a conservative choice because the information indicated a low chance of failure. However, if the effect is also from a respect for disclosure the effect should extend because a failure outcome does not change the fact of disclosure. The studies, one in the lab and one in the field, test this suggestion.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 327-345 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2004 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Education
- Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Conservative Choice, Service Failure, and Customer Loyalty: Testing the Limits of Informed Choice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver