TY - GEN
T1 - Constrained re-calibration of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes models
AU - Bin, Yuanwei
AU - Huang, George
AU - Kunz, Robert
AU - Yang, Xiang I.A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - The constants and functions in Reynolds-averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) turbulence models are coupled. Consequently, modifications of a RANS model often negatively impact its basic calibrations, which is why machine-learned augmentations are often detrimental outside the training dataset. A solution to this is to identify the degrees of freedom that do not affect the basic calibrations and only modify these identified degrees of freedom when re-calibrating the baseline model to accommodate a specific application. This approach is colloquially known as the “rubber-band” approach, which we formally call “constrained model re-calibration” in this article. To illustrate the efficacy of the approach, we identify the degrees of freedom in the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) model that do not affect the log law calibration. By subsequently interfacing data-based methods with these degrees of freedom, we train models to solve historically challenging flow scenarios, including the round-jet/plane-jet anomaly, airfoil stall, secondary flow separation, and recovery after separation. In addition to good performance inside the training dataset, the trained models yield similar performance as the baseline model outside the training dataset.
AB - The constants and functions in Reynolds-averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) turbulence models are coupled. Consequently, modifications of a RANS model often negatively impact its basic calibrations, which is why machine-learned augmentations are often detrimental outside the training dataset. A solution to this is to identify the degrees of freedom that do not affect the basic calibrations and only modify these identified degrees of freedom when re-calibrating the baseline model to accommodate a specific application. This approach is colloquially known as the “rubber-band” approach, which we formally call “constrained model re-calibration” in this article. To illustrate the efficacy of the approach, we identify the degrees of freedom in the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) model that do not affect the log law calibration. By subsequently interfacing data-based methods with these degrees of freedom, we train models to solve historically challenging flow scenarios, including the round-jet/plane-jet anomaly, airfoil stall, secondary flow separation, and recovery after separation. In addition to good performance inside the training dataset, the trained models yield similar performance as the baseline model outside the training dataset.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85194200756&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85194200756&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2514/6.2024-1572
DO - 10.2514/6.2024-1572
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85194200756
SN - 9781624107115
T3 - AIAA SciTech Forum and Exposition, 2024
BT - AIAA SciTech Forum and Exposition, 2024
PB - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA
T2 - AIAA SciTech Forum and Exposition, 2024
Y2 - 8 January 2024 through 12 January 2024
ER -