TY - JOUR
T1 - Constraining attenuation uncertainty in common midpoint radar surveys of ice sheets
AU - Holschuh, Nicholas
AU - Christianson, Knut
AU - Anandakrishnan, Sridhar
AU - Alley, Richard B.
AU - Jacobel, Robert W.
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank the National Science Foundation and the Center for Remote Sensing of Ice Sheets for funding this research (grants 0424589 and DGHZ55832) and NASA for funding N. Holschuh and K. Christianson (grant NNX16AM01G), as well as the work of the field teams who collected this data. Those teams include Leo Peters, Atsuhiro Muto, Kiya Riverman, Rickard Petterson, and Brian Welch. We would also like to thank St. Olaf College, for the use of their radar in data collection. Common offset radar data associated with these surveys can be accessed through the National Snow and Ice Data Center (http://nsidc.org/data/docs/agdc/nsidc0380_jacobel/), while the CMP data are freely available from the corresponding author.
Publisher Copyright:
©2016. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2016/10/1
Y1 - 2016/10/1
N2 - For common offset radar data, there is no clear way to disentangle path effects from reflector characteristics, so efforts to determine the physical properties at the bed using reflection amplitude are inherently limited by the constraints on englacial attenuation. In this study, we identify the theoretical considerations required for interpreting bistatic radar surveys and use data collected on the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream and Kamb Ice Stream to compute local attenuation profiles. We found that failing to correct for angle-dependent controls on return power (including antenna directivity, the reflection coefficient, and refractive focusing) can bias the computed attenuation rates as much as 30 dB/km for reflectors at 1 km depth. Because the radiation characteristics are the dominant source of uncertainty in our data, we recommend either a simplified survey design for the future (where the antennae are decoupled from the ice surface) or additional data collection to constrain the near-field permittivity and its effect on the radiation pattern. Depth-averaged attenuation rates computed using common midpoint methods for deep reflectors yield values >10 dB/km higher than attenuation rates computed using common offset techniques with the same data. We attribute these anomalously high attenuation rates to additional wavenumber-dependent (and therefore, angle-dependent) interferences between subwavelength reflectors.
AB - For common offset radar data, there is no clear way to disentangle path effects from reflector characteristics, so efforts to determine the physical properties at the bed using reflection amplitude are inherently limited by the constraints on englacial attenuation. In this study, we identify the theoretical considerations required for interpreting bistatic radar surveys and use data collected on the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream and Kamb Ice Stream to compute local attenuation profiles. We found that failing to correct for angle-dependent controls on return power (including antenna directivity, the reflection coefficient, and refractive focusing) can bias the computed attenuation rates as much as 30 dB/km for reflectors at 1 km depth. Because the radiation characteristics are the dominant source of uncertainty in our data, we recommend either a simplified survey design for the future (where the antennae are decoupled from the ice surface) or additional data collection to constrain the near-field permittivity and its effect on the radiation pattern. Depth-averaged attenuation rates computed using common midpoint methods for deep reflectors yield values >10 dB/km higher than attenuation rates computed using common offset techniques with the same data. We attribute these anomalously high attenuation rates to additional wavenumber-dependent (and therefore, angle-dependent) interferences between subwavelength reflectors.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992435571&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992435571&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/2016JF003942
DO - 10.1002/2016JF003942
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84992435571
SN - 2169-9003
VL - 121
SP - 1876
EP - 1890
JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
IS - 10
ER -