TY - JOUR
T1 - Constraining eye movement when redirecting walking trajectories alters turning control in healthy young adults
AU - Pradeep Ambati, V. N.
AU - Murray, Nicholas G.
AU - Saucedo, Fabricio
AU - Powell, Douglas W.
AU - Reed-Jones, Rebecca J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments This work was supported by the University Research Institute (URI) program at The University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP). VNPA and NGM were supported by graduate research awards from the College of Health Sciences (UTEP).
PY - 2013/5
Y1 - 2013/5
N2 - Humans use a specific steering synergy, where the eyes and head lead rotation to the new direction, when executing a turn or change in direction. Increasing evidence suggests that eye movement is critical for turning control and that when the eyes are constrained, or participants have difficulties making eye movements, steering control is disrupted. The purpose of the current study was to extend previous research regarding eye movements and steering control to a functional walking and turning task. This study investigated eye, head, trunk, and pelvis kinematics of healthy young adults during a 90 redirection of walking trajectory under two visual conditions: Free Gaze (the eyes were allowed to move naturally in the environment), and Fixed Gaze (participants were required to fixate the eyes on a target in front). Results revealed significant differences in eye, head, and trunk coordination between Free Gaze and Fixed Gaze conditions (p < 0.001). During Free Gaze, the eyes led reorientation followed by the head and trunk. Intersegment timings between the eyes, head, and trunk were significantly different (p < 0.05). In contrast, during Fixed Gaze, the segments moved together with no significant differences between segment onset times. In addition, the sequence of segment rotation during Fixed Gaze suggested a bottom-up postural perturbation control strategy in place of top-down steering control seen in Free Gaze. The results of this study support the hypothesis that eye movement is critical for the release of the steering synergy for turning control.
AB - Humans use a specific steering synergy, where the eyes and head lead rotation to the new direction, when executing a turn or change in direction. Increasing evidence suggests that eye movement is critical for turning control and that when the eyes are constrained, or participants have difficulties making eye movements, steering control is disrupted. The purpose of the current study was to extend previous research regarding eye movements and steering control to a functional walking and turning task. This study investigated eye, head, trunk, and pelvis kinematics of healthy young adults during a 90 redirection of walking trajectory under two visual conditions: Free Gaze (the eyes were allowed to move naturally in the environment), and Fixed Gaze (participants were required to fixate the eyes on a target in front). Results revealed significant differences in eye, head, and trunk coordination between Free Gaze and Fixed Gaze conditions (p < 0.001). During Free Gaze, the eyes led reorientation followed by the head and trunk. Intersegment timings between the eyes, head, and trunk were significantly different (p < 0.05). In contrast, during Fixed Gaze, the segments moved together with no significant differences between segment onset times. In addition, the sequence of segment rotation during Fixed Gaze suggested a bottom-up postural perturbation control strategy in place of top-down steering control seen in Free Gaze. The results of this study support the hypothesis that eye movement is critical for the release of the steering synergy for turning control.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877873662&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877873662&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00221-013-3466-8
DO - 10.1007/s00221-013-3466-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 23479140
AN - SCOPUS:84877873662
SN - 0014-4819
VL - 226
SP - 549
EP - 556
JO - Experimental Brain Research
JF - Experimental Brain Research
IS - 4
ER -