Consumer preferences and welfare evaluation under current food inspection measures in China: Evidence from real experiment choice of rice labels

Wenjing Nie, David Abler, Liqun Zhu, Taiping Li, Guanghua Lin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Frequent food quality and safety issues result in various food inspection measures in China, while some are not widely acknowledged by the public and are less efficient. Consumer demand is significant for priority setting in food policy. This study investigates Chinese consumers' heterogeneous preferences for selected food inspection measures and estimates welfare effects based on willingness-to-pay (WTP) calculation. Rice consumption data from a 2018 nationwide consumer survey designed using the real choice experiment is analyzed by the random parameters logit and the latent class model. The findings reveal that consumers place a high value on government certification, and brand is valuable especially when public management is perceived as weak. However, the insufficient market demand for third-party certification may increase transaction costs due to overlapping functions and consumers' distrust. Moreover, there should be a need to broaden consumers' understanding of traceability and grading systems. This study emphasizes the necessity of direct governmental involvement and the existence of unnecessary policy cost.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number4003
JournalSustainability (Switzerland)
Volume10
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Consumer preferences and welfare evaluation under current food inspection measures in China: Evidence from real experiment choice of rice labels'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this