Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Contact dermatitis associated with preservatives: Retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 1994 through 2016

  • Amber Reck Atwater
  • , Amy J. Petty
  • , Beiyu Liu
  • , Cynthia L. Green
  • , Jonathan I. Silverberg
  • , Joel G. DeKoven
  • , Donald V. Belsito
  • , Margo J. Reeder
  • , Denis Sasseville
  • , James S. Taylor
  • , Howard I. Maibach
  • , Matthew J. Zirwas
  • , James G. Marks
  • , Kathryn A. Zug
  • , Joseph F. Fowler
  • , Melanie D. Pratt
  • , Vincent A. DeLeo
  • , Erin M. Warshaw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Preservatives are often necessary components of commercial products. Large-scale North American studies on preservative allergy are limited. Objective: To evaluate demographics, positive patch test reactions (PPTRs), clinical relevance, and trends for preservatives tested by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch testing results of preservatives from 1994 through 2016. Results: A total of 50,799 patients were tested; 11,338 (22.3%) had a PPTR to at least 1 preservative. The most frequent reactions were to methylisothiazolinone 0.2% aqueous (aq) (12.2%), formaldehyde 2% aq (7.8%), formaldehyde 1% aq (7.8%), quaternium-15 2% petrolatum (pet) (7.7%), and methyldibromo glutaronitrile/phenoxyethanol 2% pet (5.1%). Paraben mix 12% pet (1%), iodopropynyl butylcarbamate 0.1% pet (0.4%), benzyl alcohol 1% pet (0.3%), and phenoxyethanol 1% pet (0.2%) had the lowest PPTRs. Linear regression analysis of preservatives tested showed that only methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone 0.01% aq (parameter estimate, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.17-0.66; P <.005) had a significant increase in PPTRs over time. Limitations: Collected variables are dependent on clinical judgment. Results may be prone to referral selection bias. Conclusions: This large North American study provides insight on preservative PPTRs and trends from 1994 through 2016.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)965-976
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume84
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2021

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dermatology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Contact dermatitis associated with preservatives: Retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 1994 through 2016'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this