TY - JOUR
T1 - Context moderates the effects of an expressive writing intervention
T2 - A randomized two-study replication and extension
AU - Nazarian, Deborah
AU - Smyth, Joshua M.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Contextual factors may influence the efficacy and outcomes of psychological interventions. Two studies experimentally examined the effects of context on an expressive writing intervention by manipulating both the investigator,s legitimate authority and the location of writing. Students (Study 1; n = 76) and community volunteers (Study 2; n = 63) were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 experimental groups (high or low authority crossed with laboratory or home writing location) or to a control condition. Experimental groups wrote about stressful experiences and the control group wrote about time management, for 20 minutes on 3 consecutive days. These studies produced divergent, but complementary, results. Study 1 demonstrated a strong effect of writing location but no clear effects of legitimate authority. In contrast, Study 2 found no statistically reliable effects for location but demonstrated effects for legitimate authority and an interaction between location and authority manipulations for depressive symptoms. These findings provide experimental upport for the view that context moderates the effectiveness of expressive writing. They also suggest that context effects common to nearly all interventions can influence efficacy and may uniquely depend on sample characteristics.
AB - Contextual factors may influence the efficacy and outcomes of psychological interventions. Two studies experimentally examined the effects of context on an expressive writing intervention by manipulating both the investigator,s legitimate authority and the location of writing. Students (Study 1; n = 76) and community volunteers (Study 2; n = 63) were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 experimental groups (high or low authority crossed with laboratory or home writing location) or to a control condition. Experimental groups wrote about stressful experiences and the control group wrote about time management, for 20 minutes on 3 consecutive days. These studies produced divergent, but complementary, results. Study 1 demonstrated a strong effect of writing location but no clear effects of legitimate authority. In contrast, Study 2 found no statistically reliable effects for location but demonstrated effects for legitimate authority and an interaction between location and authority manipulations for depressive symptoms. These findings provide experimental upport for the view that context moderates the effectiveness of expressive writing. They also suggest that context effects common to nearly all interventions can influence efficacy and may uniquely depend on sample characteristics.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77958034197&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77958034197&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1521/jscp.2010.29.8.903
DO - 10.1521/jscp.2010.29.8.903
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:77958034197
SN - 0736-7236
VL - 29
SP - 903
EP - 929
JO - Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology
JF - Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology
IS - 8
ER -