TY - JOUR
T1 - Continuous dermoepidermal junction IgM detected by direct immunofluorescence
T2 - A report of nine cases
AU - Helm, Thomas N.
AU - Valenzuela, Rafael
PY - 1992
Y1 - 1992
N2 - Background: Although a linear IgM dermatosis of pregnancy has been reported, other authors have not found evidence for a distinct linear IgM dermatosis. Objective: We set out to determine whether or not continuous dermoepidermal junction IgM deposition detected by direct immunofluorescence was indicative of a specific disease. Methods: We collected nine cases during a 9-year period in which biopsy specimens for direct immunofluorescence revealed continuous linear IgM at the dermoepidermal junction in the absence of other immunoglobulins. In all of these cases the medical record was available for review. Results: Clinical correlation revealed that these patients had a heterogeneous group of diseases with urticaria and leukocytoclastic vasculitis being most common. No diagnostic specificity could be ascribed to the linear IgM pattern, although six of our nine cases could be considered manifestations of a hypersensitivity response (e.g., urticaria, leukocytoclastic vasculitis, pigmented purpuric dermatosis, or hypersensitivity dermatitis). Conclusion: Pathologists and dermatologists should be aware that linear IgM can be seen in a variety of clinical settings. The etiopathogenic significance of this finding, if any, remains to be determined. At present, the finding must be viewed as nonspecific.
AB - Background: Although a linear IgM dermatosis of pregnancy has been reported, other authors have not found evidence for a distinct linear IgM dermatosis. Objective: We set out to determine whether or not continuous dermoepidermal junction IgM deposition detected by direct immunofluorescence was indicative of a specific disease. Methods: We collected nine cases during a 9-year period in which biopsy specimens for direct immunofluorescence revealed continuous linear IgM at the dermoepidermal junction in the absence of other immunoglobulins. In all of these cases the medical record was available for review. Results: Clinical correlation revealed that these patients had a heterogeneous group of diseases with urticaria and leukocytoclastic vasculitis being most common. No diagnostic specificity could be ascribed to the linear IgM pattern, although six of our nine cases could be considered manifestations of a hypersensitivity response (e.g., urticaria, leukocytoclastic vasculitis, pigmented purpuric dermatosis, or hypersensitivity dermatitis). Conclusion: Pathologists and dermatologists should be aware that linear IgM can be seen in a variety of clinical settings. The etiopathogenic significance of this finding, if any, remains to be determined. At present, the finding must be viewed as nonspecific.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026811181&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026811181&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0190-9622(92)70027-D
DO - 10.1016/0190-9622(92)70027-D
M3 - Article
C2 - 1552054
AN - SCOPUS:0026811181
SN - 0190-9622
VL - 26
SP - 203
EP - 206
JO - Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
JF - Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
IS - 2
ER -