TY - JOUR
T1 - Contract theory for the evolution of cooperation
T2 - The right incentives attract the right partners
AU - Archetti, Marco
N1 - Funding Information:
Douglas Yu first noticed the similarity between my model and principal-agent models and suggested using the terminology of contract theory. This work started while I was supported by a Junior Research Fellowship at St. John’s College, Oxford and continued while I was supported by NSF Grant SES-0750480 at Harvard University.
Copyright:
Copyright 2011 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2011/1/21
Y1 - 2011/1/21
N2 - Partner choice is a critical stage of many biological interactions, from mating to cooperation. When the quality of the potential partners is unknown, one way to choose is to rely on signaling: costly signals can reveal the quality of the sender and allow the receiver to choose. In some cases, however, signaling (or an active choice based on signals) is not possible, for example in the initiation of the symbiosis between the squid Euprymna scolopes and the bioluminescent bacterium Vibrio fischeri. How is partner choice possible in this and other similar cases? I show that in a game with asymmetric information without signaling, imposing a deliberate cost for establishing the interaction allows the non-informed individual to attract the right partner if the cost induces only high quality individuals to accept the interaction. Furthermore, imposing different costs and rewards may induce the informed individuals to screen themselves according to their types, and therefore allow the non-informed individual to establish an association with the correct partners in the absence of signaling.
AB - Partner choice is a critical stage of many biological interactions, from mating to cooperation. When the quality of the potential partners is unknown, one way to choose is to rely on signaling: costly signals can reveal the quality of the sender and allow the receiver to choose. In some cases, however, signaling (or an active choice based on signals) is not possible, for example in the initiation of the symbiosis between the squid Euprymna scolopes and the bioluminescent bacterium Vibrio fischeri. How is partner choice possible in this and other similar cases? I show that in a game with asymmetric information without signaling, imposing a deliberate cost for establishing the interaction allows the non-informed individual to attract the right partner if the cost induces only high quality individuals to accept the interaction. Furthermore, imposing different costs and rewards may induce the informed individuals to screen themselves according to their types, and therefore allow the non-informed individual to establish an association with the correct partners in the absence of signaling.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78149245576&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78149245576&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.10.025
DO - 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.10.025
M3 - Article
C2 - 21035464
AN - SCOPUS:78149245576
SN - 0022-5193
VL - 269
SP - 201
EP - 207
JO - Journal of Theoretical Biology
JF - Journal of Theoretical Biology
IS - 1
ER -