TY - JOUR
T1 - Contradictory KRAS mutation test results in a patient with metastatic colon cancer
T2 - A clinical dilemma in the era of personalized medicine
AU - Lamparella, Nicholas E.
AU - Saroya, Bikramajit S.
AU - Yang, Zhaohai
AU - Sarwani, Nabeel E.
AU - El-Deiry, Wafik S.
PY - 2013/8
Y1 - 2013/8
N2 - The KRAS oncogene is mutated in 40-50% of colorectal cancers and confers resistance to EGFR-targeted therapy. In the clinic, agents such as cetuximab or panitumumab target the EGFR receptor for therapeutic benefit. Cetuximab was approved by the FDA in 2012 as first-line therapy for KRAS mutation-negative (wild-type), EGFR-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer, in combination with FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, leucovorin). Herein we report a case of metastatic colon cancer with conflicting testing results for the KRAS oncogene from two different reference laboratories. The discordant reports complicated the decision-making process regarding the administration of targeted anti-EGFR personalized therapy. As the second test result was wild-type from the same original pathological specimen, the patient was treated with cetuximab-containing combination chemotherapy and appeared to have a response after prior disease progression. It is unclear whether the observed response was fully due to regression of wild-type KRAS-containing tumor or any component of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity to a heterogeneous tumor in this patient.
AB - The KRAS oncogene is mutated in 40-50% of colorectal cancers and confers resistance to EGFR-targeted therapy. In the clinic, agents such as cetuximab or panitumumab target the EGFR receptor for therapeutic benefit. Cetuximab was approved by the FDA in 2012 as first-line therapy for KRAS mutation-negative (wild-type), EGFR-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer, in combination with FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, leucovorin). Herein we report a case of metastatic colon cancer with conflicting testing results for the KRAS oncogene from two different reference laboratories. The discordant reports complicated the decision-making process regarding the administration of targeted anti-EGFR personalized therapy. As the second test result was wild-type from the same original pathological specimen, the patient was treated with cetuximab-containing combination chemotherapy and appeared to have a response after prior disease progression. It is unclear whether the observed response was fully due to regression of wild-type KRAS-containing tumor or any component of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity to a heterogeneous tumor in this patient.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881419624&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881419624&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4161/cbt.25095
DO - 10.4161/cbt.25095
M3 - Article
C2 - 23792572
AN - SCOPUS:84881419624
SN - 1538-4047
VL - 14
SP - 699
EP - 702
JO - Cancer Biology and Therapy
JF - Cancer Biology and Therapy
IS - 8
ER -