Controlling is not enough: The importance of measuring the process and specific effectiveness of psychotherapy treatment and control conditions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

The major argument of this article is that failing to measure what is taking place in treatment and control conditions can lead to scientifically invalid conclusions. It is argued that researchers are ethically responsible for being aware that variables related to the therapist, client, and the therapeutic relationship (as well as their interaction) might play a confounding role when treatment and control conditions are compared. As a consequence, they should either measure these variables or be tentative in their interpretation of their findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)31-42
Number of pages12
JournalEthics and Behavior
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • General Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Controlling is not enough: The importance of measuring the process and specific effectiveness of psychotherapy treatment and control conditions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this