TY - JOUR
T1 - Convergence in Engineering and Architectural Design Education
T2 - 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, ASEE 2021
AU - Solnosky, Ryan
AU - Ling, Moses
AU - Iulo, Lisa D.
AU - Goldberg, David Eric
AU - Atamturktur, Sez
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr. Sez Atamturktur is the Harry and Arlene Schell Professor and Department Head of Architectural Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University. Previously, she served as Associate Vice President for Research Development and Provost’s Distinguished Professor at Clemson University. Dr. Atamturktur’s research, which focuses on uncertainty quantification in scientific computing, has been documented in over 100 peer-reviewed publications in some of the finest engineering science journals and proceedings. Dr. Atamturktur’s research has received funding from several federal agencies including the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy, the Department of the Interior, the Department of Transportation, the Department of Education, and the Los Alamos National Laboratory, as well as industry organizations and partners, such as the National Masonry Concrete Association and Nucor. She served as the director of the National Science Foundation-funded Tigers ADVANCE project, which focuses on improving the status of women and minority faculty at Clemson. Previously, Dr. Atamturktur was the director of the National Science Foundation-funded National Research Traineeship project at Clemson, with funding for over 30 doctoral students and a goal of initiating a new degree program on scientific computing and data analytics for resilient infrastructure systems. In addition, Dr. Atamturktur was the director of two separate Department of Education-funded Graduate Assistantships in Areas of National Need projects that each provided funding for 10 doctoral students. Dr. Atamturktur served as one of the four co-directors of Clemson’s Center of Excellence in Next Generation Computing and Creativity. Prior to joining Clemson University, Dr. Atamturktur served as an LTV technical staff member at Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Publisher Copyright:
© American Society for Engineering Education, 2021
PY - 2021/7/26
Y1 - 2021/7/26
N2 - This paper presents a convergence-driven educational approach for a newly formulated cross-disciplinary design studio for architecture, landscape architecture and engineering students. The studio, titled Mission Driven Integrated Design (MDID), was taught in both Spring and Summer 2020 and is continuing to be offered in Spring 2021. Studio-based educational settings documented in literature often rely less on formal lecture delivery but instead adopt a Socratic mentoring style. At the forefront of the traditional architectural education, studios place creative emphasis on how to develop the aesthetics through form and space with general function of the building and engineering systems taking a secondary role. A comprehensive design studio, especially one including engineering students, on the other hand, interconnects architectural design and engineering principles to simultaneously achieve two goals. The first goal is delivering traditional content that is in architectural design studios for architects; and the second is the inoculating system-level thinking and integrated design of supporting building systems. To achieve these two goals, interdependencies between spatial organization and engineering systems are emphasized in the MDID studio course. Emphasis is placed on such topics as the iterative design process, systems-of-systems thinking, considerations on how to maximize overall building performance and occupant well-being all while keeping the design environmentally conscious and economically viable. By interlinking the architectural and engineering aspects, the course provides a learning experience where students focus on integrated solutions that require careful coordination of various design decisions, study of the synergies and tradeoffs each decision and convergence of disciplinary expertise to reach a holistic yet balanced design. This paper discusses how the studio courses can mutually support cross-disciplinary collaboration of architecture, landscape architecture, architectural engineering students by providing mission driven lenses informed by real-world issues and clients. Discussion points in the paper include course outcomes, collaborative mechanisms for multi-disciplinary instruction - both in-person and remote, teaching students to focus on the mission of the project, format of the course and generalizable trends on the success of the course.
AB - This paper presents a convergence-driven educational approach for a newly formulated cross-disciplinary design studio for architecture, landscape architecture and engineering students. The studio, titled Mission Driven Integrated Design (MDID), was taught in both Spring and Summer 2020 and is continuing to be offered in Spring 2021. Studio-based educational settings documented in literature often rely less on formal lecture delivery but instead adopt a Socratic mentoring style. At the forefront of the traditional architectural education, studios place creative emphasis on how to develop the aesthetics through form and space with general function of the building and engineering systems taking a secondary role. A comprehensive design studio, especially one including engineering students, on the other hand, interconnects architectural design and engineering principles to simultaneously achieve two goals. The first goal is delivering traditional content that is in architectural design studios for architects; and the second is the inoculating system-level thinking and integrated design of supporting building systems. To achieve these two goals, interdependencies between spatial organization and engineering systems are emphasized in the MDID studio course. Emphasis is placed on such topics as the iterative design process, systems-of-systems thinking, considerations on how to maximize overall building performance and occupant well-being all while keeping the design environmentally conscious and economically viable. By interlinking the architectural and engineering aspects, the course provides a learning experience where students focus on integrated solutions that require careful coordination of various design decisions, study of the synergies and tradeoffs each decision and convergence of disciplinary expertise to reach a holistic yet balanced design. This paper discusses how the studio courses can mutually support cross-disciplinary collaboration of architecture, landscape architecture, architectural engineering students by providing mission driven lenses informed by real-world issues and clients. Discussion points in the paper include course outcomes, collaborative mechanisms for multi-disciplinary instruction - both in-person and remote, teaching students to focus on the mission of the project, format of the course and generalizable trends on the success of the course.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124573289&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85124573289&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85124573289
SN - 2153-5965
JO - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
JF - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
Y2 - 26 July 2021 through 29 July 2021
ER -