TY - JOUR
T1 - Convex and non-convex approaches for statistical inference with class-conditional noisy labels
AU - Song, Hyebin
AU - Dai, Ran
AU - Raskutti, Garvesh
AU - Barber, Rina Foygel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Hyebin Song, Ran Dai, Garvesh Raskutti, and Rina Foygel Barber.
PY - 2020/8
Y1 - 2020/8
N2 - We study the problem of estimation and testing in logistic regression with class-conditional noise in the observed labels, which has an important implication in the Positive-Unlabeled (PU) learning setting. With the key observation that the label noise problem belongs to a special sub-class of generalized linear models (GLM), we discuss convex and non-convex approaches that address this problem. A non-convex approach based on the maximum likelihood estimation produces an estimator with several optimal properties, but a convex approach has an obvious advantage in optimization. We demonstrate that in the lowdimensional setting, both estimators are consistent and asymptotically normal, where the asymptotic variance of the non-convex estimator is smaller than the convex counterpart. We also quantify the efficiency gap which provides insight into when the two methods are comparable. In the high-dimensional setting, we show that both estimation procedures achieve l2-consistency at the minimax optimal √s log p/n rates under mild conditions. Finally, we propose an inference procedure using a de-biasing approach. We validate our theoretical findings through simulations and a real-data example.
AB - We study the problem of estimation and testing in logistic regression with class-conditional noise in the observed labels, which has an important implication in the Positive-Unlabeled (PU) learning setting. With the key observation that the label noise problem belongs to a special sub-class of generalized linear models (GLM), we discuss convex and non-convex approaches that address this problem. A non-convex approach based on the maximum likelihood estimation produces an estimator with several optimal properties, but a convex approach has an obvious advantage in optimization. We demonstrate that in the lowdimensional setting, both estimators are consistent and asymptotically normal, where the asymptotic variance of the non-convex estimator is smaller than the convex counterpart. We also quantify the efficiency gap which provides insight into when the two methods are comparable. In the high-dimensional setting, we show that both estimation procedures achieve l2-consistency at the minimax optimal √s log p/n rates under mild conditions. Finally, we propose an inference procedure using a de-biasing approach. We validate our theoretical findings through simulations and a real-data example.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85094891267&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85094891267&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85094891267
SN - 1532-4435
VL - 21
JO - Journal of Machine Learning Research
JF - Journal of Machine Learning Research
ER -