Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare two theories that relate the proportion of diversified firms in the economy and the implied discount for diversified firms: the first is a real-options model predicting a positive relationship between the discount and management’s choice to operate a diversified firm; the second is based on catering theory, in which a negative relationship is predicted, as management is attentive to investor preference concerning diversified firms. Design/methodology/approach: This study proposes a new aggregate measure of the diversification discount. The authors’ measure allows for decomposition of the discount into firm-level mispricing, industry-level mispricing and long-run fundamental value components. Findings: Results support a catering theory of diversification. The discount appears to be the result of firm-level mispricing. Thus, providing an explanation for why, in light of the observed discount, a large number of diversified firms persist. Originality/value: To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to provide evidence that firm-level mispricing may drive the observed diversification discount.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 405-424 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Review of Accounting and Finance |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 3 2018 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Accounting
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
- Finance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corporate diversification: Can the observed diversification discount shed light on management’s choice to diversify or re-focus?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver