Abstract
This paper extends previous analyses of industrial policy from a corporatist perspective. We advocate a mid-level measure of group influence; the measure is based upon analysis of newspaper stories. A preliminary exploration of NewsBank data is reported, and several interesting trends in economic development policy are isolated. Business and education are heavily involved in policymaking whereas labor and political parties are not at all involved. On the whole, a meso-corporatist model in which business, state government, and education are partners seems to fit better than a business capture model. Some speculations are offered about this new American form of corporatism and its resemblance to the Japanese case.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 315-329 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Journal of Public Policy |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 1991 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Public Administration
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corporatism Without Labor? Industrial Policymaking in the American States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver