Abstract
Two data points for conductance G (nanosiemens) versus effective defect diameter D (nanometers), cited from ref 7 [Feng et al. Nat. Mater. 2016, 15 (8), 850?855] and ref 8 (Feng et al. Nature 2016, 536, 197?200), were plotted incorrectly in Figure 5c. The first data point of 10 nS is estimated from Figure 4e in ref 7 for a pore of diameter 1 nm, and the second data point of 20 nS is estimated from Figure 2a in ref 8 for a pore diameter 2 nm. We have wrongly plotted their respective conductances as 1 and 2 nS, and the correct values from the references are 10 nS (pink triangle with red outline) and 20 nS (pink triangle with blue outline), respectively. Please note that this does not affect the discussion of the paper. This correction is shown in the revised Figure 5c below: (Figure Presented).
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 627 |
Number of pages | 1 |
Journal | Nano letters |
Volume | 19 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs |
|
State | Published - Jan 9 2019 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Bioengineering
- General Chemistry
- General Materials Science
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Mechanical Engineering