Correction: Understanding cation effects in electrochemical CO2 reduction (Energy and Environmental Science (2019) 12 (3001-3014) DOI: 10.1039/C9EE01341E)

Stefan Ringe, Ezra L. Clark, Joaquin Resasco, Amber Walton, Brian Seger, Alexis T. Bell, Karen Chan

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

In the original version of the manuscript, the fit function presented in the caption of Fig. 7 for the hydrated ions was wrong. The correct function was -2.2x + 7.2 (change highlighted in bold). Therefore the x-axis positions of the different cations in Fig. S17 which were obtained from this correlation function were also wrong. The correct Figure is as follows: (Figure Presented).. In addition, Fig. 6a used the wrong cation sizes for the organic cation data points. The updated Figure is given below: Previous studies electrodeposited a Ag monolayer on Pt or Au and found the PZC to be up to 0.25 V more positive compared to Ag(111). (Figure Presented). The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3609-3610
Number of pages2
JournalEnergy and Environmental Science
Volume12
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2019

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering
  • Pollution

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correction: Understanding cation effects in electrochemical CO2 reduction (Energy and Environmental Science (2019) 12 (3001-3014) DOI: 10.1039/C9EE01341E)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this