Correlates with perfectionism and the utility of a dual process model

Anthony J. Bergman, Jennifer E. Nyland, Lawrence R. Burns

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

77 Scopus citations


Previous research regarding perfectionism points toward many of its negative correlates. Other research has suggested support for the notion that perfection is related to both positive and negative aspects. In this study, we utilize the dual process model explicated by Slade and Owens (1998) that indicates an essential distinction between positive (adaptive) and negative (maladaptive) perfectionism. According to this model, positive and negative perfectionists may exhibit the same or similar behavior prima facie, but their latent motivations and corresponding affective states and cognitive processes are different. Correlates with positive and negative perfectionism were investigated. Negative perfectionism was found to correlate with emotional suppression as a coping mechanism, maximization, cognitive dysfunctions, depression, and regret. Positive perfectionism was found to correlate with life-satisfaction and maximization, but not with cognitive dysfunctions, depression, and regret, among other maladaptive characteristics. We argue these results (1) provide indicative evidence for the dual process model, and thus contend it will be useful for interpreting perfectionism in the future, and (2) raise important implications regarding the nature of the distinction between positive and negative perfectionism as well as between perfectionism and maximization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)389-399
Number of pages11
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jul 2007

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Psychology


Dive into the research topics of 'Correlates with perfectionism and the utility of a dual process model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this