TY - JOUR
T1 - Correlation of clinical and pathological staging and response to neoadjuvant therapy in resected pancreatic cancer
AU - Mirkin, Katelin A.
AU - Greenleaf, Erin K.
AU - Hollenbeak, Christopher S.
AU - Wong, Joyce
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 IJS Publishing Group Ltd
PY - 2018/4
Y1 - 2018/4
N2 - Background: Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has been increasingly employed to optimize outcomes in pancreatic cancer; however, little is known about its pathologic impact. Methods: The National Cancer Data Base (2003–2011) was retrospectively reviewed for patients with pancreatic carcinoma who underwent initial surgery or NAT followed by resection. Response to NAT, determined by comparing clinical and pathologic stage, and survival were evaluated. Results: 16,087 patients underwent initial pancreatectomy and 2307 patients received NAT. Clinical stage correlated poorly with pathological stage in patients who received initial surgery (κ = 0.2865, p < 0.001). With NAT, 21.9% were downstaged, 47.9% had no stage change, and 30.3% progressed. In clinical stage II disease, patients downstaged with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or multimodality therapy demonstrated improved survival over patients who did not respond or who progressed (P = 0.0022, P = 0.0012, respectively). This benefit was not preserved in stage III disease (P = 0.7380, P = 0.0726, respectively). In multivariable analysis, downstage in disease was associated with a 19% lower hazard of mortality (HR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.7–0.92, P = 0.002). Conclusions: Clinical stage correlates poorly with pathological stage in resectable pancreatic cancer. The majority of patients do not experience a change in stage with NAT. Those with early stage disease, responsive to NAT, experience a survival benefit.
AB - Background: Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has been increasingly employed to optimize outcomes in pancreatic cancer; however, little is known about its pathologic impact. Methods: The National Cancer Data Base (2003–2011) was retrospectively reviewed for patients with pancreatic carcinoma who underwent initial surgery or NAT followed by resection. Response to NAT, determined by comparing clinical and pathologic stage, and survival were evaluated. Results: 16,087 patients underwent initial pancreatectomy and 2307 patients received NAT. Clinical stage correlated poorly with pathological stage in patients who received initial surgery (κ = 0.2865, p < 0.001). With NAT, 21.9% were downstaged, 47.9% had no stage change, and 30.3% progressed. In clinical stage II disease, patients downstaged with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or multimodality therapy demonstrated improved survival over patients who did not respond or who progressed (P = 0.0022, P = 0.0012, respectively). This benefit was not preserved in stage III disease (P = 0.7380, P = 0.0726, respectively). In multivariable analysis, downstage in disease was associated with a 19% lower hazard of mortality (HR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.7–0.92, P = 0.002). Conclusions: Clinical stage correlates poorly with pathological stage in resectable pancreatic cancer. The majority of patients do not experience a change in stage with NAT. Those with early stage disease, responsive to NAT, experience a survival benefit.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85042779733
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042779733&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.043
DO - 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.043
M3 - Article
C2 - 29425826
AN - SCOPUS:85042779733
SN - 1743-9191
VL - 52
SP - 221
EP - 228
JO - International Journal of Surgery
JF - International Journal of Surgery
ER -