Corrigendum: Comment on ‘First accuracy evaluation of NIST-F2’

Kurt Gibble

doi:10.1088/0026-1394/53/3/1009

Corrigendum: Comment on ‘First accuracy evaluation of NIST-F2’

Kurt Gibble

Physics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

A factor of 1/(t_2L − t_1L) was omitted in the typesetting of the first equation in (1). Results and discussions in my Comment were based on: (formula presented) Measured frequency shifts of NIST-F2 versus microwave amplitude for n = (1,3,5,7) π/2 pulses [1]. There has been subsequent discussion about the uncertainty analysis of the microwave lensing frequency shift of NIST-F2. Table 1 gives the NIST-F2 data [1] that I used to calculate the χ² surface.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1009
Number of pages	1
Journal	Metrologia
Volume	53
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/53/3/1009
State	Published - Jun 2016

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

General Engineering

Access to Document

10.1088/0026-1394/53/3/1009

Cite this

@article{1d85813a14e949eea764868cb59e623b,

title = "Corrigendum: Comment on {\textquoteleft}First accuracy evaluation of NIST-F2{\textquoteright}",

abstract = "A factor of 1/(t2L − t1L) was omitted in the typesetting of the first equation in (1). Results and discussions in my Comment were based on: (formula presented) Measured frequency shifts of NIST-F2 versus microwave amplitude for n = (1,3,5,7) π/2 pulses [1]. There has been subsequent discussion about the uncertainty analysis of the microwave lensing frequency shift of NIST-F2. Table 1 gives the NIST-F2 data [1] that I used to calculate the χ2 surface.",

author = "Kurt Gibble",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016 BIPM \& IOP Publishing Ltd. All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved. This article is available under the terms of the IOP-Standard License.",

year = "2016",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1088/0026-1394/53/3/1009",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "53",

pages = "1009",

journal = "Metrologia",

issn = "0026-1394",

publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corrigendum

T2 - Comment on ‘First accuracy evaluation of NIST-F2’

AU - Gibble, Kurt

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2016 BIPM & IOP Publishing Ltd. All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved. This article is available under the terms of the IOP-Standard License.

PY - 2016/6

Y1 - 2016/6

N2 - A factor of 1/(t2L − t1L) was omitted in the typesetting of the first equation in (1). Results and discussions in my Comment were based on: (formula presented) Measured frequency shifts of NIST-F2 versus microwave amplitude for n = (1,3,5,7) π/2 pulses [1]. There has been subsequent discussion about the uncertainty analysis of the microwave lensing frequency shift of NIST-F2. Table 1 gives the NIST-F2 data [1] that I used to calculate the χ2 surface.

AB - A factor of 1/(t2L − t1L) was omitted in the typesetting of the first equation in (1). Results and discussions in my Comment were based on: (formula presented) Measured frequency shifts of NIST-F2 versus microwave amplitude for n = (1,3,5,7) π/2 pulses [1]. There has been subsequent discussion about the uncertainty analysis of the microwave lensing frequency shift of NIST-F2. Table 1 gives the NIST-F2 data [1] that I used to calculate the χ2 surface.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105047772540

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105047772540#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1088/0026-1394/53/3/1009

DO - 10.1088/0026-1394/53/3/1009

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:105047772540

SN - 0026-1394

VL - 53

SP - 1009

JO - Metrologia

JF - Metrologia

IS - 3

ER -

Corrigendum: Comment on ‘First accuracy evaluation of NIST-F2’

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this