Corrigendum to ‘Epidural analgesia versus dural puncture epidural analgesia in labouring parturients: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials’(Br J Anaesth 2025; 134: 1402–14) (British Journal of Anaesthesia (2025) 134(5) (1402–1414), (S0007091225000984), (10.1016/j.bja.2025.01.033))

Preet Mohinder Singh, David T. Monks, Adithya D. Bhat, Anuradha Borle, Manpreet Kaur, Phillip Yang, Muthuraj Kanakaraj

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

The following errors have been identified in the above article. 1. Reference 20 should read: ‘Wang J. A randomized trial of the dural puncture epidural technique combined with programmed intermittent epidural boluses for labor analgesia. Ann Palliat Med 2021; 10: 404–14’. 2. In Table 2 (Summary of Findings), the incidence of unilateral block in the epidural group should read ‘14/100’ instead of ‘1/100’. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1140
Number of pages1
JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume135
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2025

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to ‘Epidural analgesia versus dural puncture epidural analgesia in labouring parturients: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials’(Br J Anaesth 2025; 134: 1402–14) (British Journal of Anaesthesia (2025) 134(5) (1402–1414), (S0007091225000984), (10.1016/j.bja.2025.01.033))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this