Corrigendum to “Implicit moral evaluations: A multinomial modeling approach” [Cognition 158 (2017) 224–241] (S0010027716302530) (10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.013))

The authors noticed an error in the computation of the w effect size in the modeling analyses. Corrected values of w are reported with initial values in parentheses: In Section 2.2.2, w's are 0.01 (0.03), 0.24 (0.48), 0.01 (0.02), and 0.02 (0.04). In Section 3.2.2, w's are 0.15 (0.45), 0.01 (0.02), and 0.02 (0.06). In Section 4.2.2, w's are 0.02 (0.08), 0.02 (0.06), 0.00 (0.01), 0.01 (0.04), 0.02 (0.05), and 0.03 (0.10). In Section 5.2.2, w's are 0.00 (0.00) and 0.03 (0.06). In Section 6.2.2, w's are 0.03 (0.05), 0.00 (0.01), 0.01 (0.01), 0.00 (0.00), 0.05 (0.08), 0.05 (0.08), 0.00 (0.00), 0.03 (0.06). In Table 2, w's are 0.24 (0.48), 0.01 (0.02), and 0.02 (0.04). In Tables 4 and 6, w's are 0.02 (0.06). In Table 8, w is 0.03 (0.06). In Table 10, w's for voter group comparisons are 0.04 (0.06) and 0.03 (0.06) and for prime comparisons are 0.00 (0.00) and 0.00 (0.00). This error does not change any results or interpretations about model fit based upon the G-squared statistic, or about significant differences across conditions in process parameters. Therefore, it does not change any of the hypothesis tests or conclusions. Additionally, the authors noticed minor input typos in Table 5. Corrected values for prime-target descriptive statistics are reported, with initial values in parentheses: Wrong-Idiographic M is 0.14 (0.15), Wrong-Neutral SD is 0.24 (0.23), Idiographic-Wrong SD is 0.16 (0.17), Idiographic-Neutral SD is 0.23 (0.22), Negative-Idiographic M is 0.16 (0.17), Negative-Negative SD is 0.25 (0.26), Negative-Neutral M is 0.46 (0.45), Neutral-Wrong M is 0.22 (0.23), and Neutral-Negative M is 0.60 (0.59). These were table input errors that do not impact the ANOVAs or Hedges’ g effect size computations, and thus do not change any conclusions about the behavioral results. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.