Corrigendum to “The “re-meaning” of project success: Updating and recalibrating for a modern project management” [International Journal of Project Management, 40(7), 835-848](S0263786322000990)(10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.08.001)

Lavagnon A. Ika, Jeffrey K. Pinto

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

The authors regret that after publication of the above mentioned it was pointed out that our proposed four-dimensional model of project success includes, not nine, but instead eight combinations of the first three dimensions: project plan, business case, and green. Indeed, combinations #4 and #9 appear to be redundant, as they both describe projects that are project plan and business case failures but green successes. The authors thank Rich Maltzman, who kindly noted and made us aware of this error. The following graphic cube, suggested by Rich, depicts the correct eight combinations. The error is entirely our own and we apologize for any inconvenience or confusion arising.[Formula

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number102432
JournalInternational Journal of Project Management
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2023

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Building and Construction
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “The “re-meaning” of project success: Updating and recalibrating for a modern project management” [International Journal of Project Management, 40(7), 835-848](S0263786322000990)(10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.08.001)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this