Cosmological parameter uncertainties from salt-II type IA supernova light curve models

J. Mosher, J. Guy, R. Kessler, P. Astier, J. Marriner, M. Betoule, M. Sako, P. El-Hage, R. Biswas, R. Pain, S. Kuhlmann, N. Regnault, J. A. Frieman, D. P. Schneider

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

65 Scopus citations

Abstract

We use simulated type Ia supernova (SN Ia) samples, including both photometry and spectra, to perform the first direct validation of cosmology analysis using the SALT-II light curve model. This validation includes residuals from the light curve training process, systematic biases in SN Ia distance measurements, and a bias on the dark energy equation of state parameter w. Using the SN-analysis package SNANA, we simulate and analyze realistic samples corresponding to the data samples used in the SNLS3 analysis: ∼120 low-redshift (z < 0.1) SNe Ia, ∼255 Sloan Digital Sky Survey SNe Ia (z < 0.4), and ∼290 SNLS SNe Ia (z ≤ 1). To probe systematic uncertainties in detail, we vary the input spectral model, the model of intrinsic scatter, and the smoothing (i.e., regularization) parameters used during the SALT-II model training. Using realistic intrinsic scatter models results in a slight bias in the ultraviolet portion of the trained SALT-II model, and w biases (w input-w recovered) ranging from -0.005 ± 0.012 to -0.024 ± 0.010. These biases are indistinguishable from each other within the uncertainty; the average bias on w is -0.014 ± 0.007.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number16
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume793
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 20 2014

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cosmological parameter uncertainties from salt-II type IA supernova light curve models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this