TY - JOUR
T1 - Cosmological parameter uncertainties from salt-II type IA supernova light curve models
AU - Mosher, J.
AU - Guy, J.
AU - Kessler, R.
AU - Astier, P.
AU - Marriner, J.
AU - Betoule, M.
AU - Sako, M.
AU - El-Hage, P.
AU - Biswas, R.
AU - Pain, R.
AU - Kuhlmann, S.
AU - Regnault, N.
AU - Frieman, J. A.
AU - Schneider, D. P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved..
PY - 2014/9/20
Y1 - 2014/9/20
N2 - We use simulated type Ia supernova (SN Ia) samples, including both photometry and spectra, to perform the first direct validation of cosmology analysis using the SALT-II light curve model. This validation includes residuals from the light curve training process, systematic biases in SN Ia distance measurements, and a bias on the dark energy equation of state parameter w. Using the SN-analysis package SNANA, we simulate and analyze realistic samples corresponding to the data samples used in the SNLS3 analysis: ∼120 low-redshift (z < 0.1) SNe Ia, ∼255 Sloan Digital Sky Survey SNe Ia (z < 0.4), and ∼290 SNLS SNe Ia (z ≤ 1). To probe systematic uncertainties in detail, we vary the input spectral model, the model of intrinsic scatter, and the smoothing (i.e., regularization) parameters used during the SALT-II model training. Using realistic intrinsic scatter models results in a slight bias in the ultraviolet portion of the trained SALT-II model, and w biases (w input-w recovered) ranging from -0.005 ± 0.012 to -0.024 ± 0.010. These biases are indistinguishable from each other within the uncertainty; the average bias on w is -0.014 ± 0.007.
AB - We use simulated type Ia supernova (SN Ia) samples, including both photometry and spectra, to perform the first direct validation of cosmology analysis using the SALT-II light curve model. This validation includes residuals from the light curve training process, systematic biases in SN Ia distance measurements, and a bias on the dark energy equation of state parameter w. Using the SN-analysis package SNANA, we simulate and analyze realistic samples corresponding to the data samples used in the SNLS3 analysis: ∼120 low-redshift (z < 0.1) SNe Ia, ∼255 Sloan Digital Sky Survey SNe Ia (z < 0.4), and ∼290 SNLS SNe Ia (z ≤ 1). To probe systematic uncertainties in detail, we vary the input spectral model, the model of intrinsic scatter, and the smoothing (i.e., regularization) parameters used during the SALT-II model training. Using realistic intrinsic scatter models results in a slight bias in the ultraviolet portion of the trained SALT-II model, and w biases (w input-w recovered) ranging from -0.005 ± 0.012 to -0.024 ± 0.010. These biases are indistinguishable from each other within the uncertainty; the average bias on w is -0.014 ± 0.007.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906957830&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906957830&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/0004-637X/793/1/16
DO - 10.1088/0004-637X/793/1/16
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84906957830
SN - 0004-637X
VL - 793
JO - Astrophysical Journal
JF - Astrophysical Journal
IS - 1
M1 - 16
ER -