Abstract
Intra-arterial bevacizumab (IA BV) has been recently identified to be safe in the treatment of recurrent GBM. In this study, we sought to perform a cost analysis of IA BV versus IV BV especially also taking account of patient progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We show that IA BV is significantly more cost effective than conventional IV therapy.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 183-186 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Journal of Experimental Therapeutics and Oncology |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| State | Published - 2011 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Pharmacology
- Drug Discovery
- Cancer Research
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cost analysis of intra-arterial versus intra-venous delivery of bevacizumab for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver