Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cost-effectiveness of community-based interventions for reducing opioid overdose and non-overdose deaths: simulation modeling of HEALing Communities Study

  • Jagpreet Chhatwal
  • , Mert Sahinkoc
  • , Qiushi Chen
  • , William Dowd
  • , Jade Xiao
  • , Gary A. Zarkin
  • , Arnie Aldridge
  • , Joshua A. Barocas
  • , Magdalena Cerdá
  • , Naleef Fareed
  • , Lisa A. Frazier
  • , Ayaz Hyder
  • , Katherine M. Keyes
  • , Charles E. Knott
  • , Marc LaRochelle
  • , Benjamin P. Linas
  • , Emmanuel Oga
  • , Sara M. Roberts
  • , Jeffrey H. Samet
  • , Bruce R. Schackman
  • Eric E. Seiber, Laura E. Starbird, Jennifer Villani, Amy B. Knudsen, Carolina Barbosa

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Background: The opioid overdose crisis remains a public health emergency in the United States. Evidence-based practices—including medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and naloxone distribution—can reduce harms, but their community-level cost-effectiveness is uncertain and may vary locally. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of enhanced community-level implementation of evidence-based practices for opioid use disorder (OUD). Methods: We used a validated microsimulation model of OUD, calibrated with data from the HEALing Communities Study across 26 highly impacted communities in Massachusetts, New York, and Ohio. Six intervention scenarios for 2025–2030: maintaining 2024 evidence-based practice levels (status quo); improved naloxone distribution; improved MOUD retention; improved MOUD initiation; combined initiation and retention; and combined initiation, retention, and naloxone distribution. Outcomes included opioid overdose deaths (OODs), non-overdose opioid-related deaths, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs (healthcare and societal), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Findings: Maintaining 2024 evidence-based practice levels was projected to yield OODs of 39–468 per 100,000 and non-overdose deaths of 238–3018 per 100,000 across communities. Enhancing MOUD initiation, retention, and naloxone distribution reduced OODs by 15–40% and non-overdose deaths by 7–24%, producing the largest QALY gains (1006–38,292). From the healthcare perspective, improved initiation plus retention was cost-effective in all communities (ICER US$11,765–US$91,058 per QALY); from the societal perspective, all enhanced scenarios were cost-saving (US$121 million–US$4.74 billion net savings). Interpretation: Community-level enhancement of MOUD initiation and retention, and for some communities also enhancing naloxone distribution, can substantially reduce opioid-related—overdose and non-overdose—deaths. These strategies are cost-effective from a healthcare perspective and cost-saving from a societal perspective, supporting investment in comprehensive, community-tailored interventions. Funding: NIH HEAL Initiative.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number101480
JournalThe Lancet Regional Health - Americas
Volume59
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Internal Medicine
  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-effectiveness of community-based interventions for reducing opioid overdose and non-overdose deaths: simulation modeling of HEALing Communities Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this