TY - JOUR
T1 - Covid and productivity in Europe
T2 - A responsiveness perspective
AU - Cooper, Russell
AU - Horn, Carl Wolfram
AU - Indraccolo, Leonardo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - This paper studies the effects of Covid-19 on manufacturing output, employment and productivity across a set of European countries. Using a quantitative firm dynamics model with endogenous entry and exit, key parameters of adjustment costs and market power are estimated to match country-specific responsiveness of firms to exogenous shocks. The estimated model is used to simulate the effects of the Covid-19 shock, with and without policy measures. As seen through counterfactual exercises, the main impact of the policy interventions, treated here as work-sharing schemes targeted to low profitability firms and “no-firing” obligations, was to mitigate the drop in aggregate employment by keeping firms in business. Depending on the country, we calculate that the aggregate drop in employment would have been between 1.0 and 1.9 percentage points higher without policy support. We do not find evidence of adverse productivity effects from these interventions. From these counterfactuals, we establish the importance of targeted subsidies and the sensitivity of employment responses to firm beliefs.
AB - This paper studies the effects of Covid-19 on manufacturing output, employment and productivity across a set of European countries. Using a quantitative firm dynamics model with endogenous entry and exit, key parameters of adjustment costs and market power are estimated to match country-specific responsiveness of firms to exogenous shocks. The estimated model is used to simulate the effects of the Covid-19 shock, with and without policy measures. As seen through counterfactual exercises, the main impact of the policy interventions, treated here as work-sharing schemes targeted to low profitability firms and “no-firing” obligations, was to mitigate the drop in aggregate employment by keeping firms in business. Depending on the country, we calculate that the aggregate drop in employment would have been between 1.0 and 1.9 percentage points higher without policy support. We do not find evidence of adverse productivity effects from these interventions. From these counterfactuals, we establish the importance of targeted subsidies and the sensitivity of employment responses to firm beliefs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85183490972&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85183490972&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2023.104655
DO - 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2023.104655
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85183490972
SN - 0014-2921
VL - 163
JO - European Economic Review
JF - European Economic Review
M1 - 104655
ER -