Abstract
The English "good and" intensifier is discussed as an example of a form that is acceptable even though ungrammatical, both synchronically and diachronically. The construction is analyzed as a case of creative analogy: the extension of a grammatically generated form to a new function, one for which it has no direct grammatical justification. From the perspective of a "dynamic" theory of language acquisition and evolution, it is argued that such forms constitute a new sort of evidence regarding the nature of language universals.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 595-617 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Journal of Psycholinguistic Research |
Volume | 9 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 1 1980 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Language and Linguistics
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- General Psychology
- Linguistics and Language