Abstract
Four hundred and fifty college students rated the credibility of the rationales and procedural descriptions of two therapy, three placebo, and one component-control procedure frequently used in analogue outcome research. The rating scale was designed to assess both the credibility and the expectancy for improvement generated by the rationales. The results indicated that the control conditions were, in general, less credible than the therapy conditions. Implications for outcome research are briefly discussed.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 257-260 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 1972 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Credibility of analogue therapy rationales'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver