TY - JOUR
T1 - Critical culturalized comprehension
T2 - Exploring culture as learners thinking about texts
AU - List, Alexandra
AU - Campos Oaxaca, Gala S.
AU - Du, Hongcui
AU - Lee, Hye Yeon
AU - Lyu, Bailing
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Division 15, American Psychological Association.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - We examine the role of culture in comprehension. Prominent theories of comprehension conceptualized the outcome of reading as learners’ construction of a cognitive representation of texts. We emphasize that such representation reflects not only texts’ content, but also individuals’ understandings of the real world, as described in texts. We suggest that, thus, individuals should be supported to question and analyze the mental representations that they form; we use the term “culture” to capture such questioning and analysis. Rather than an individual difference factor, we argue for conceptualizing culture as a way of thinking, or as individuals’ reasoning about the commonalities and differences in their and others’ worldviews and the linking of these to underlying values. When such reasoning is engaged in reference to texts, we refer to this as culturalized comprehension; when such reasoning is further engaged to resist or recast the values introduced in texts to generate counternarratives, we refer to this as critical culturalized comprehension. In emphasizing the importance of culturalized and critical culturalized comprehension and describing the set of cognitive processes involved, we argue for research in educational psychology to examine how learners may be consciously, reflectively, and critically engaged in using texts to understand their world.
AB - We examine the role of culture in comprehension. Prominent theories of comprehension conceptualized the outcome of reading as learners’ construction of a cognitive representation of texts. We emphasize that such representation reflects not only texts’ content, but also individuals’ understandings of the real world, as described in texts. We suggest that, thus, individuals should be supported to question and analyze the mental representations that they form; we use the term “culture” to capture such questioning and analysis. Rather than an individual difference factor, we argue for conceptualizing culture as a way of thinking, or as individuals’ reasoning about the commonalities and differences in their and others’ worldviews and the linking of these to underlying values. When such reasoning is engaged in reference to texts, we refer to this as culturalized comprehension; when such reasoning is further engaged to resist or recast the values introduced in texts to generate counternarratives, we refer to this as critical culturalized comprehension. In emphasizing the importance of culturalized and critical culturalized comprehension and describing the set of cognitive processes involved, we argue for research in educational psychology to examine how learners may be consciously, reflectively, and critically engaged in using texts to understand their world.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177425701&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85177425701&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00461520.2023.2266028
DO - 10.1080/00461520.2023.2266028
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85177425701
SN - 0046-1520
VL - 59
SP - 1
EP - 19
JO - Educational Psychologist
JF - Educational Psychologist
IS - 1
ER -